Side-by-side comparison of pricing, 12 benchmarks, and generation speed.
| Metric | MiMo-V2.5 | Qwen3 Coder 480B A35B Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| Input ($/M tokens) | $0.36 | $0.3 |
| Output ($/M tokens) | $1.8 | $1.8 |
Data from Artificial Analysis API — 12 benchmarks
Qwen3 Coder 480B A35B Instruct is cheaper overall. Its blended price (3:1 input/output ratio) is $0.68/M tokens vs $0.72/M for MiMo-V2.5.
MiMo-V2.5 wins 7 out of 12 benchmarks compared to 5 for Qwen3 Coder 480B A35B Instruct. See the detailed benchmark chart above for per-category results.
MiMo-V2.5 generates tokens faster at 89 tok/s vs 66 tok/s. However, Qwen3 Coder 480B A35B Instruct has lower time-to-first-token (1.57s vs 2.26s).
Choose based on your priorities: Qwen3 Coder 480B A35B Instruct for lower cost, MiMo-V2.5 for stronger benchmark performance, and MiMo-V2.5 for faster generation. For latency-sensitive apps, check the TTFT comparison above.