Compare/MiMo-V2.5-Pro (Non-reasoning) vs DeepSeek V3.1 Terminus (Reasoning)

MiMo-V2.5-Pro (Non-reasoning)vsDeepSeek V3.1 Terminus (Reasoning)

Side-by-side comparison of pricing, 12 benchmarks, and generation speed.

Xiaomi

MiMo-V2.5-Pro (Non-reasoning)

Input
$0.9/M
Output
$2.7/M
Speed
53 tok/s
TTFT
2.42s
DeepSeek

DeepSeek V3.1 Terminus (Reasoning)

Input
$1.635/M
Output
$2.75/M
Speed
TTFT

Winner by Category

Cheaper
MiMo-V2.5-Pro (Non-reasoning)
Faster (tok/s)
MiMo-V2.5-Pro (Non-reasoning)
Lower Latency
DeepSeek V3.1 Terminus (Reasoning)
Benchmarks (3-8)
DeepSeek V3.1 Terminus (Reasoning)

Pricing Comparison

MetricMiMo-V2.5-Pro (Non-reasoning)DeepSeek V3.1 Terminus (Reasoning)
Input ($/M tokens)$0.9$1.635
Output ($/M tokens)$2.7$2.75
Cost for 1M input + 100K output tokens:
MiMo-V2.5-Pro (Non-reasoning)$1.17
DeepSeek V3.1 Terminus (Reasoning)$1.91

Speed Comparison

Output Speed (tokens/s) — higher is better
MiMo-V2.5-Pro (Non-reasoning)
53 tok/s
DeepSeek V3.1 Terminus (Reasoning)
Time to First Token (seconds) — lower is better
MiMo-V2.5-Pro (Non-reasoning)
2.42s
DeepSeek V3.1 Terminus (Reasoning)

Benchmark Comparison

Data from Artificial Analysis API — 12 benchmarks

Intelligence Index
35.633.9
Coding Index
36.833.7
Math Index
89.7
GPQA Diamond
76.2%79.2%
MMLU-Pro
85.1%
LiveCodeBench
79.8%
AIME 2025
89.7%
MATH-500
Humanity's Last Exam
13.3%15.2%
SciCode
39.1%40.6%
IFBench
42.7%57.0%
TerminalBench
35.6%30.3%
MiMo-V2.5-Pro (Non-reasoning)3 wins
8 winsDeepSeek V3.1 Terminus (Reasoning)

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is cheaper, MiMo-V2.5-Pro (Non-reasoning) or DeepSeek V3.1 Terminus (Reasoning)?

MiMo-V2.5-Pro (Non-reasoning) is cheaper overall. Its blended price (3:1 input/output ratio) is $1.35/M tokens vs $1.91/M for DeepSeek V3.1 Terminus (Reasoning).

Which model performs better on benchmarks?

DeepSeek V3.1 Terminus (Reasoning) wins 8 out of 12 benchmarks compared to 3 for MiMo-V2.5-Pro (Non-reasoning). See the detailed benchmark chart above for per-category results.

Which is faster for real-time applications?

MiMo-V2.5-Pro (Non-reasoning) generates tokens faster at 53 tok/s vs 0 tok/s. However, DeepSeek V3.1 Terminus (Reasoning) has lower time-to-first-token (0.00s vs 2.42s).

When should I use MiMo-V2.5-Pro (Non-reasoning) vs DeepSeek V3.1 Terminus (Reasoning)?

Choose based on your priorities: MiMo-V2.5-Pro (Non-reasoning) for lower cost, DeepSeek V3.1 Terminus (Reasoning) for stronger benchmark performance, and MiMo-V2.5-Pro (Non-reasoning) for faster generation. For latency-sensitive apps, check the TTFT comparison above.