Side-by-side comparison of pricing, 12 benchmarks, and generation speed.
| Metric | MiMo-V2.5-Pro (Non-reasoning) | Qwen3.5 27B (Non-reasoning) |
|---|---|---|
| Input ($/M tokens) | $0.9 | $0.3 |
| Output ($/M tokens) | $2.7 | $2.6 |
Data from Artificial Analysis API — 12 benchmarks
Qwen3.5 27B (Non-reasoning) is cheaper overall. Its blended price (3:1 input/output ratio) is $0.88/M tokens vs $1.35/M for MiMo-V2.5-Pro (Non-reasoning).
MiMo-V2.5-Pro (Non-reasoning) wins 4 out of 12 benchmarks compared to 3 for Qwen3.5 27B (Non-reasoning). See the detailed benchmark chart above for per-category results.
Qwen3.5 27B (Non-reasoning) generates tokens faster at 92 tok/s vs 53 tok/s. However, Qwen3.5 27B (Non-reasoning) has lower time-to-first-token (1.41s vs 2.42s).
Choose based on your priorities: Qwen3.5 27B (Non-reasoning) for lower cost, MiMo-V2.5-Pro (Non-reasoning) for stronger benchmark performance, and Qwen3.5 27B (Non-reasoning) for faster generation. For latency-sensitive apps, check the TTFT comparison above.