Compare/MiMo-V2-Pro vs Qwen3.6 Plus

MiMo-V2-ProvsQwen3.6 Plus

Side-by-side comparison of pricing, 12 benchmarks, and generation speed.

Xiaomi

MiMo-V2-Pro

Input
$1/M
Output
$3/M
Speed
TTFT
Alibaba

Qwen3.6 Plus

Input
$0.5/M
Output
$3/M
Speed
52 tok/s
TTFT
1.80s

Winner by Category

Cheaper
Qwen3.6 Plus
Faster (tok/s)
Qwen3.6 Plus
Lower Latency
MiMo-V2-Pro
Benchmarks (3-4)
Qwen3.6 Plus

Pricing Comparison

MetricMiMo-V2-ProQwen3.6 Plus
Input ($/M tokens)$1$0.5
Output ($/M tokens)$3$3
Cost for 1M input + 100K output tokens:
MiMo-V2-Pro$1.30
Qwen3.6 Plus$0.80

Speed Comparison

Output Speed (tokens/s) — higher is better
MiMo-V2-Pro
Qwen3.6 Plus
52 tok/s
Time to First Token (seconds) — lower is better
MiMo-V2-Pro
Qwen3.6 Plus
1.80s

Benchmark Comparison

Data from Artificial Analysis API — 12 benchmarks

Intelligence Index
40.339.6
Coding Index
54.5
Math Index
GPQA Diamond
87.0%88.2%
MMLU-Pro
LiveCodeBench
AIME 2025
MATH-500
Humanity's Last Exam
28.3%25.7%
SciCode
42.5%40.7%
IFBench
68.8%75.2%
TerminalBench
40.9%43.9%
MiMo-V2-Pro3 wins
4 winsQwen3.6 Plus

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is cheaper, MiMo-V2-Pro or Qwen3.6 Plus?

Qwen3.6 Plus is cheaper overall. Its blended price (3:1 input/output ratio) is $1.13/M tokens vs $1.50/M for MiMo-V2-Pro.

Which model performs better on benchmarks?

Qwen3.6 Plus wins 4 out of 12 benchmarks compared to 3 for MiMo-V2-Pro. See the detailed benchmark chart above for per-category results.

Which is faster for real-time applications?

Qwen3.6 Plus generates tokens faster at 52 tok/s vs 0 tok/s. MiMo-V2-Pro also has lower time-to-first-token (0.00s vs 1.80s).

When should I use MiMo-V2-Pro vs Qwen3.6 Plus?

Choose based on your priorities: Qwen3.6 Plus for lower cost, Qwen3.6 Plus for stronger benchmark performance, and Qwen3.6 Plus for faster generation. For latency-sensitive apps, check the TTFT comparison above.