Compare/MiniCPM-V 4.6 1.3B vs GPT-5.4 nano (xhigh)

MiniCPM-V 4.6 1.3BvsGPT-5.4 nano (xhigh)

Side-by-side comparison of pricing, 12 benchmarks, and generation speed.

OpenBMB

MiniCPM-V 4.6 1.3B

Input
$0/M
Output
$0/M
Speed
TTFT
OpenAI

GPT-5.4 nano (xhigh)

Input
$0.2/M
Output
$1.25/M
Speed
149 tok/s
TTFT
3.70s

Winner by Category

Cheaper
MiniCPM-V 4.6 1.3B
Faster (tok/s)
GPT-5.4 nano (xhigh)
Lower Latency
MiniCPM-V 4.6 1.3B
Benchmarks (0-7)
GPT-5.4 nano (xhigh)

Pricing Comparison

MetricMiniCPM-V 4.6 1.3BGPT-5.4 nano (xhigh)
Input ($/M tokens)$0$0.2
Output ($/M tokens)$0$1.25
Cost for 1M input + 100K output tokens:
MiniCPM-V 4.6 1.3B$0.00
GPT-5.4 nano (xhigh)$0.33

Speed Comparison

Output Speed (tokens/s) — higher is better
MiniCPM-V 4.6 1.3B
GPT-5.4 nano (xhigh)
149 tok/s
Time to First Token (seconds) — lower is better
MiniCPM-V 4.6 1.3B
GPT-5.4 nano (xhigh)
3.70s

Benchmark Comparison

Data from Artificial Analysis API — 12 benchmarks

Intelligence Index
12.744.0
Coding Index
0.743.9
Math Index
GPQA Diamond
30.5%81.7%
MMLU-Pro
LiveCodeBench
AIME 2025
MATH-500
Humanity's Last Exam
4.9%26.5%
SciCode
2.1%46.9%
IFBench
26.7%75.9%
TerminalBench
0.0%42.4%
MiniCPM-V 4.6 1.3B0 wins
7 winsGPT-5.4 nano (xhigh)

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is cheaper, MiniCPM-V 4.6 1.3B or GPT-5.4 nano (xhigh)?

MiniCPM-V 4.6 1.3B is cheaper overall. Its blended price (3:1 input/output ratio) is $0.00/M tokens vs $0.46/M for GPT-5.4 nano (xhigh).

Which model performs better on benchmarks?

GPT-5.4 nano (xhigh) wins 7 out of 12 benchmarks compared to 0 for MiniCPM-V 4.6 1.3B. See the detailed benchmark chart above for per-category results.

Which is faster for real-time applications?

GPT-5.4 nano (xhigh) generates tokens faster at 149 tok/s vs 0 tok/s. MiniCPM-V 4.6 1.3B also has lower time-to-first-token (0.00s vs 3.70s).

When should I use MiniCPM-V 4.6 1.3B vs GPT-5.4 nano (xhigh)?

Choose based on your priorities: MiniCPM-V 4.6 1.3B for lower cost, GPT-5.4 nano (xhigh) for stronger benchmark performance, and GPT-5.4 nano (xhigh) for faster generation. For latency-sensitive apps, check the TTFT comparison above.