Compare/Mistral Small 3.1 vs Llama 2 Chat 7B

Mistral Small 3.1vsLlama 2 Chat 7B

Side-by-side comparison of pricing, 12 benchmarks, and generation speed.

Mistral

Mistral Small 3.1

Input
$0.105/M
Output
$0.235/M
Speed
155 tok/s
TTFT
0.51s
Meta

Llama 2 Chat 7B

Input
$0.05/M
Output
$0.25/M
Speed
98 tok/s
TTFT
15.54s

Winner by Category

Cheaper
Llama 2 Chat 7B
Faster (tok/s)
Mistral Small 3.1
Lower Latency
Mistral Small 3.1
Benchmarks (11-1)
Mistral Small 3.1

Pricing Comparison

MetricMistral Small 3.1Llama 2 Chat 7B
Input ($/M tokens)$0.105$0.05
Output ($/M tokens)$0.235$0.25
Cost for 1M input + 100K output tokens:
Mistral Small 3.1$0.13
Llama 2 Chat 7B$0.08

Speed Comparison

Output Speed (tokens/s) — higher is better
Mistral Small 3.1
155 tok/s
Llama 2 Chat 7B
98 tok/s
Time to First Token (seconds) — lower is better
Mistral Small 3.1
0.51s
Llama 2 Chat 7B
15.54s

Benchmark Comparison

Data from Artificial Analysis API — 12 benchmarks

Intelligence Index
14.59.7
Coding Index
13.9
Math Index
3.7
GPQA Diamond
45.4%22.7%
MMLU-Pro
65.9%16.4%
LiveCodeBench
21.2%0.2%
AIME 2025
3.7%
MATH-500
70.7%5.9%
Humanity's Last Exam
4.8%5.8%
SciCode
26.5%0.0%
IFBench
29.9%
TerminalBench
7.6%
Mistral Small 3.111 wins
1 winsLlama 2 Chat 7B

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is cheaper, Mistral Small 3.1 or Llama 2 Chat 7B?

Llama 2 Chat 7B is cheaper overall. Its blended price (3:1 input/output ratio) is $0.10/M tokens vs $0.14/M for Mistral Small 3.1.

Which model performs better on benchmarks?

Mistral Small 3.1 wins 11 out of 12 benchmarks compared to 1 for Llama 2 Chat 7B. See the detailed benchmark chart above for per-category results.

Which is faster for real-time applications?

Mistral Small 3.1 generates tokens faster at 155 tok/s vs 98 tok/s. Mistral Small 3.1 also has lower time-to-first-token (0.51s vs 15.54s).

When should I use Mistral Small 3.1 vs Llama 2 Chat 7B?

Choose based on your priorities: Llama 2 Chat 7B for lower cost, Mistral Small 3.1 for stronger benchmark performance, and Mistral Small 3.1 for faster generation. For latency-sensitive apps, check the TTFT comparison above.