Compare/North Mini Code vs gpt-oss-120b (high)

North Mini Codevsgpt-oss-120b (high)

Side-by-side comparison of pricing, 12 benchmarks, and generation speed.

Cohere

North Mini Code

Input
$0/M
Output
$0/M
Speed
111 tok/s
TTFT
0.19s
OpenAI

gpt-oss-120b (high)

Input
$0.15/M
Output
$0.6/M
Speed
250 tok/s
TTFT
0.52s

Winner by Category

Cheaper
North Mini Code
Faster (tok/s)
gpt-oss-120b (high)
Lower Latency
North Mini Code
Benchmarks (2-9)
gpt-oss-120b (high)

Pricing Comparison

MetricNorth Mini Codegpt-oss-120b (high)
Input ($/M tokens)$0$0.15
Output ($/M tokens)$0$0.6
Cost for 1M input + 100K output tokens:
North Mini Code$0.00
gpt-oss-120b (high)$0.21

Speed Comparison

Output Speed (tokens/s) — higher is better
North Mini Code
111 tok/s
gpt-oss-120b (high)
250 tok/s
Time to First Token (seconds) — lower is better
North Mini Code
0.19s
gpt-oss-120b (high)
0.52s

Benchmark Comparison

Data from Artificial Analysis API — 12 benchmarks

Intelligence Index
20.623.8
Coding Index
36.530.4
Math Index
93.4
GPQA Diamond
75.7%78.2%
MMLU-Pro
80.8%
LiveCodeBench
87.8%
AIME 2025
93.4%
MATH-500
Humanity's Last Exam
9.9%18.5%
SciCode
38.2%38.9%
IFBench
57.6%69.0%
TerminalBench
31.1%23.5%
North Mini Code2 wins
9 winsgpt-oss-120b (high)

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is cheaper, North Mini Code or gpt-oss-120b (high)?

North Mini Code is cheaper overall. Its blended price (3:1 input/output ratio) is $0.00/M tokens vs $0.26/M for gpt-oss-120b (high).

Which model performs better on benchmarks?

gpt-oss-120b (high) wins 9 out of 12 benchmarks compared to 2 for North Mini Code. See the detailed benchmark chart above for per-category results.

Which is faster for real-time applications?

gpt-oss-120b (high) generates tokens faster at 250 tok/s vs 111 tok/s. North Mini Code also has lower time-to-first-token (0.19s vs 0.52s).

When should I use North Mini Code vs gpt-oss-120b (high)?

Choose based on your priorities: North Mini Code for lower cost, gpt-oss-120b (high) for stronger benchmark performance, and gpt-oss-120b (high) for faster generation. For latency-sensitive apps, check the TTFT comparison above.