Side-by-side comparison of pricing, 12 benchmarks, and generation speed.
| Metric | Nova 2.0 Lite (medium) | Qwen3.5 27B (Reasoning) |
|---|---|---|
| Input ($/M tokens) | $0.3 | $0.3 |
| Output ($/M tokens) | $2.5 | $2.4 |
Data from Artificial Analysis API — 12 benchmarks
Qwen3.5 27B (Reasoning) is cheaper overall. Its blended price (3:1 input/output ratio) is $0.82/M tokens vs $0.85/M for Nova 2.0 Lite (medium).
Qwen3.5 27B (Reasoning) wins 7 out of 12 benchmarks compared to 4 for Nova 2.0 Lite (medium). See the detailed benchmark chart above for per-category results.
Nova 2.0 Lite (medium) generates tokens faster at 206 tok/s vs 90 tok/s. However, Qwen3.5 27B (Reasoning) has lower time-to-first-token (1.31s vs 10.32s).
Choose based on your priorities: Qwen3.5 27B (Reasoning) for lower cost, Qwen3.5 27B (Reasoning) for stronger benchmark performance, and Nova 2.0 Lite (medium) for faster generation. For latency-sensitive apps, check the TTFT comparison above.