Side-by-side comparison of pricing, 12 benchmarks, and generation speed.
| Metric | NVIDIA Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B (Non-reasoning) | Olmo 3 7B Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| Input ($/M tokens) | $0.05 | $0.1 |
| Output ($/M tokens) | $0.2 | $0.2 |
Data from Artificial Analysis API — 12 benchmarks
NVIDIA Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B (Non-reasoning) is cheaper overall. Its blended price (3:1 input/output ratio) is $0.09/M tokens vs $0.13/M for Olmo 3 7B Instruct.
NVIDIA Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B (Non-reasoning) wins 7 out of 12 benchmarks compared to 4 for Olmo 3 7B Instruct. See the detailed benchmark chart above for per-category results.
NVIDIA Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B (Non-reasoning) generates tokens faster at 80 tok/s vs 0 tok/s. However, Olmo 3 7B Instruct has lower time-to-first-token (0.00s vs 0.29s).
Choose based on your priorities: NVIDIA Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B (Non-reasoning) for lower cost, NVIDIA Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B (Non-reasoning) for stronger benchmark performance, and NVIDIA Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B (Non-reasoning) for faster generation. For latency-sensitive apps, check the TTFT comparison above.