Side-by-side comparison of pricing, 12 benchmarks, and generation speed.
| Metric | NVIDIA Nemotron 3 Super 120B A12B (Reasoning) | Llama 3.2 Instruct 90B (Vision) |
|---|---|---|
| Input ($/M tokens) | $0.3 | $0.72 |
| Output ($/M tokens) | $0.75 | $0.72 |
Data from Artificial Analysis API — 12 benchmarks
NVIDIA Nemotron 3 Super 120B A12B (Reasoning) is cheaper overall. Its blended price (3:1 input/output ratio) is $0.41/M tokens vs $0.72/M for Llama 3.2 Instruct 90B (Vision).
NVIDIA Nemotron 3 Super 120B A12B (Reasoning) wins 7 out of 12 benchmarks compared to 3 for Llama 3.2 Instruct 90B (Vision). See the detailed benchmark chart above for per-category results.
NVIDIA Nemotron 3 Super 120B A12B (Reasoning) generates tokens faster at 370 tok/s vs 42 tok/s. However, Llama 3.2 Instruct 90B (Vision) has lower time-to-first-token (0.37s vs 0.55s).
Choose based on your priorities: NVIDIA Nemotron 3 Super 120B A12B (Reasoning) for lower cost, NVIDIA Nemotron 3 Super 120B A12B (Reasoning) for stronger benchmark performance, and NVIDIA Nemotron 3 Super 120B A12B (Reasoning) for faster generation. For latency-sensitive apps, check the TTFT comparison above.