Side-by-side comparison of pricing, 12 benchmarks, and generation speed.
| Metric | NVIDIA Nemotron Nano 12B v2 VL (Reasoning) | Olmo 3.1 32B Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| Input ($/M tokens) | $0.2 | $0.2 |
| Output ($/M tokens) | $0.6 | $0.6 |
Data from Artificial Analysis API — 12 benchmarks
Both models have similar pricing. Check the detailed breakdown above for input vs output token costs.
NVIDIA Nemotron Nano 12B v2 VL (Reasoning) wins 10 out of 12 benchmarks compared to 1 for Olmo 3.1 32B Instruct. See the detailed benchmark chart above for per-category results.
NVIDIA Nemotron Nano 12B v2 VL (Reasoning) generates tokens faster at 132 tok/s vs 55 tok/s. NVIDIA Nemotron Nano 12B v2 VL (Reasoning) also has lower time-to-first-token (0.23s vs 0.23s).
Choose based on your priorities: both are similarly priced, NVIDIA Nemotron Nano 12B v2 VL (Reasoning) for stronger benchmark performance, and NVIDIA Nemotron Nano 12B v2 VL (Reasoning) for faster generation. For latency-sensitive apps, check the TTFT comparison above.