Compare/o1-mini vs Llama 3.3 Instruct 70B

o1-minivsLlama 3.3 Instruct 70B

Side-by-side comparison of pricing, 12 benchmarks, and generation speed.

OpenAI

o1-mini

Input
$0/M
Output
$0/M
Speed
TTFT
Meta

Llama 3.3 Instruct 70B

Input
$0.58/M
Output
$0.71/M
Speed
99 tok/s
TTFT
0.49s

Winner by Category

Cheaper
o1-mini
Faster (tok/s)
Llama 3.3 Instruct 70B
Lower Latency
o1-mini
Benchmarks (7-5)
o1-mini

Pricing Comparison

Metrico1-miniLlama 3.3 Instruct 70B
Input ($/M tokens)$0$0.58
Output ($/M tokens)$0$0.71
Cost for 1M input + 100K output tokens:
o1-mini$0.00
Llama 3.3 Instruct 70B$0.65

Speed Comparison

Output Speed (tokens/s) — higher is better
o1-mini
Llama 3.3 Instruct 70B
99 tok/s
Time to First Token (seconds) — lower is better
o1-mini
Llama 3.3 Instruct 70B
0.49s

Benchmark Comparison

Data from Artificial Analysis API — 12 benchmarks

Intelligence Index
20.414.5
Coding Index
10.7
Math Index
7.7
GPQA Diamond
60.3%49.8%
MMLU-Pro
74.2%71.3%
LiveCodeBench
57.6%28.8%
AIME 2025
7.7%
MATH-500
94.4%77.3%
Humanity's Last Exam
4.9%4.0%
SciCode
32.3%26.0%
IFBench
47.1%
TerminalBench
3.0%
o1-mini7 wins
5 winsLlama 3.3 Instruct 70B

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is cheaper, o1-mini or Llama 3.3 Instruct 70B?

o1-mini is cheaper overall. Its blended price (3:1 input/output ratio) is $0.00/M tokens vs $0.64/M for Llama 3.3 Instruct 70B.

Which model performs better on benchmarks?

o1-mini wins 7 out of 12 benchmarks compared to 5 for Llama 3.3 Instruct 70B. See the detailed benchmark chart above for per-category results.

Which is faster for real-time applications?

Llama 3.3 Instruct 70B generates tokens faster at 99 tok/s vs 0 tok/s. o1-mini also has lower time-to-first-token (0.00s vs 0.49s).

When should I use o1-mini vs Llama 3.3 Instruct 70B?

Choose based on your priorities: o1-mini for lower cost, o1-mini for stronger benchmark performance, and Llama 3.3 Instruct 70B for faster generation. For latency-sensitive apps, check the TTFT comparison above.