Compare/o3-mini (high) vs Claude 4.5 Haiku (Reasoning)

o3-mini (high)vsClaude 4.5 Haiku (Reasoning)

Side-by-side comparison of pricing, 12 benchmarks, and generation speed.

OpenAI

o3-mini (high)

Input
$1.1/M
Output
$4.4/M
Speed
148 tok/s
TTFT
23.74s
Anthropic

Claude 4.5 Haiku (Reasoning)

Input
$1/M
Output
$5/M
Speed
139 tok/s
TTFT
9.86s

Winner by Category

Cheaper
o3-mini (high)
Faster (tok/s)
o3-mini (high)
Lower Latency
Claude 4.5 Haiku (Reasoning)
Benchmarks (6-6)
Tie

Pricing Comparison

Metrico3-mini (high)Claude 4.5 Haiku (Reasoning)
Input ($/M tokens)$1.1$1
Output ($/M tokens)$4.4$5
Cost for 1M input + 100K output tokens:
o3-mini (high)$1.54
Claude 4.5 Haiku (Reasoning)$1.50

Speed Comparison

Output Speed (tokens/s) — higher is better
o3-mini (high)
148 tok/s
Claude 4.5 Haiku (Reasoning)
139 tok/s
Time to First Token (seconds) — lower is better
o3-mini (high)
23.74s
Claude 4.5 Haiku (Reasoning)
9.86s

Benchmark Comparison

Data from Artificial Analysis API — 12 benchmarks

Intelligence Index
25.237.1
Coding Index
17.332.6
Math Index
83.7
GPQA Diamond
77.3%67.2%
MMLU-Pro
80.2%76.0%
LiveCodeBench
73.4%61.5%
AIME 2025
83.7%
MATH-500
98.5%
Humanity's Last Exam
12.3%9.7%
SciCode
39.8%43.3%
IFBench
67.1%54.3%
TerminalBench
6.1%27.3%
o3-mini (high)6 wins
6 winsClaude 4.5 Haiku (Reasoning)

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is cheaper, o3-mini (high) or Claude 4.5 Haiku (Reasoning)?

o3-mini (high) is cheaper overall. Its blended price (3:1 input/output ratio) is $1.93/M tokens vs $2.00/M for Claude 4.5 Haiku (Reasoning).

Which model performs better on benchmarks?

It's a tie — both models win 6 benchmarks each across 12 evaluated categories. See the detailed benchmark chart above for per-category results.

Which is faster for real-time applications?

o3-mini (high) generates tokens faster at 148 tok/s vs 139 tok/s. However, Claude 4.5 Haiku (Reasoning) has lower time-to-first-token (9.86s vs 23.74s).

When should I use o3-mini (high) vs Claude 4.5 Haiku (Reasoning)?

Choose based on your priorities: o3-mini (high) for lower cost, both perform similarly on benchmarks, and o3-mini (high) for faster generation. For latency-sensitive apps, check the TTFT comparison above.