Compare/o3-mini (high) vs DeepSeek R1 (Jan '25)

o3-mini (high)vsDeepSeek R1 (Jan '25)

Side-by-side comparison of pricing, 12 benchmarks, and generation speed.

OpenAI

o3-mini (high)

Input
$1.1/M
Output
$4.4/M
Speed
148 tok/s
TTFT
23.74s
DeepSeek

DeepSeek R1 (Jan '25)

Input
$1.35/M
Output
$4/M
Speed
TTFT

Winner by Category

Cheaper
o3-mini (high)
Faster (tok/s)
o3-mini (high)
Lower Latency
DeepSeek R1 (Jan '25)
Benchmarks (8-3)
o3-mini (high)

Pricing Comparison

Metrico3-mini (high)DeepSeek R1 (Jan '25)
Input ($/M tokens)$1.1$1.35
Output ($/M tokens)$4.4$4
Cost for 1M input + 100K output tokens:
o3-mini (high)$1.54
DeepSeek R1 (Jan '25)$1.75

Speed Comparison

Output Speed (tokens/s) — higher is better
o3-mini (high)
148 tok/s
DeepSeek R1 (Jan '25)
Time to First Token (seconds) — lower is better
o3-mini (high)
23.74s
DeepSeek R1 (Jan '25)

Benchmark Comparison

Data from Artificial Analysis API — 12 benchmarks

Intelligence Index
25.218.8
Coding Index
17.315.9
Math Index
68.0
GPQA Diamond
77.3%70.8%
MMLU-Pro
80.2%84.4%
LiveCodeBench
73.4%61.7%
AIME 2025
68.0%
MATH-500
98.5%96.6%
Humanity's Last Exam
12.3%9.3%
SciCode
39.8%35.7%
IFBench
67.1%39.0%
TerminalBench
6.1%6.1%
o3-mini (high)8 wins
3 winsDeepSeek R1 (Jan '25)

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is cheaper, o3-mini (high) or DeepSeek R1 (Jan '25)?

o3-mini (high) is cheaper overall. Its blended price (3:1 input/output ratio) is $1.93/M tokens vs $2.36/M for DeepSeek R1 (Jan '25).

Which model performs better on benchmarks?

o3-mini (high) wins 8 out of 12 benchmarks compared to 3 for DeepSeek R1 (Jan '25). See the detailed benchmark chart above for per-category results.

Which is faster for real-time applications?

o3-mini (high) generates tokens faster at 148 tok/s vs 0 tok/s. However, DeepSeek R1 (Jan '25) has lower time-to-first-token (0.00s vs 23.74s).

When should I use o3-mini (high) vs DeepSeek R1 (Jan '25)?

Choose based on your priorities: o3-mini (high) for lower cost, o3-mini (high) for stronger benchmark performance, and o3-mini (high) for faster generation. For latency-sensitive apps, check the TTFT comparison above.