Compare/o3 vs Jamba 1.7 Large

o3vsJamba 1.7 Large

Side-by-side comparison of pricing, 12 benchmarks, and generation speed.

OpenAI

o3

Input
$2/M
Output
$8/M
Speed
99 tok/s
TTFT
6.84s
AI21 Labs

Jamba 1.7 Large

Input
$2/M
Output
$8/M
Speed
52 tok/s
TTFT
0.77s

Winner by Category

Cheaper
Tie
Faster (tok/s)
o3
Lower Latency
Jamba 1.7 Large
Benchmarks (12-0)
o3

Pricing Comparison

Metrico3Jamba 1.7 Large
Input ($/M tokens)$2$2
Output ($/M tokens)$8$8
Cost for 1M input + 100K output tokens:
o3$2.80
Jamba 1.7 Large$2.80

Speed Comparison

Output Speed (tokens/s) — higher is better
o3
99 tok/s
Jamba 1.7 Large
52 tok/s
Time to First Token (seconds) — lower is better
o3
6.84s
Jamba 1.7 Large
0.77s

Benchmark Comparison

Data from Artificial Analysis API — 12 benchmarks

Intelligence Index
38.410.9
Coding Index
38.47.8
Math Index
88.32.3
GPQA Diamond
82.7%39.0%
MMLU-Pro
85.3%57.7%
LiveCodeBench
80.8%18.1%
AIME 2025
88.3%2.3%
MATH-500
99.2%60.0%
Humanity's Last Exam
20.0%3.8%
SciCode
41.0%18.8%
IFBench
71.4%35.2%
TerminalBench
37.1%2.3%
o312 wins
0 winsJamba 1.7 Large

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is cheaper, o3 or Jamba 1.7 Large?

Both models have similar pricing. Check the detailed breakdown above for input vs output token costs.

Which model performs better on benchmarks?

o3 wins 12 out of 12 benchmarks compared to 0 for Jamba 1.7 Large. See the detailed benchmark chart above for per-category results.

Which is faster for real-time applications?

o3 generates tokens faster at 99 tok/s vs 52 tok/s. However, Jamba 1.7 Large has lower time-to-first-token (0.77s vs 6.84s).

When should I use o3 vs Jamba 1.7 Large?

Choose based on your priorities: both are similarly priced, o3 for stronger benchmark performance, and o3 for faster generation. For latency-sensitive apps, check the TTFT comparison above.