Side-by-side comparison of pricing, 12 benchmarks, and generation speed.
| Metric | Olmo 3.1 32B Instruct | NVIDIA Nemotron Nano 12B v2 VL (Non-reasoning) |
|---|---|---|
| Input ($/M tokens) | $0.2 | $0.2 |
| Output ($/M tokens) | $0.6 | $0.6 |
Data from Artificial Analysis API — 12 benchmarks
Both models have similar pricing. Check the detailed breakdown above for input vs output token costs.
NVIDIA Nemotron Nano 12B v2 VL (Non-reasoning) wins 6 out of 12 benchmarks compared to 4 for Olmo 3.1 32B Instruct. See the detailed benchmark chart above for per-category results.
NVIDIA Nemotron Nano 12B v2 VL (Non-reasoning) generates tokens faster at 138 tok/s vs 55 tok/s. Olmo 3.1 32B Instruct also has lower time-to-first-token (0.23s vs 0.53s).
Choose based on your priorities: both are similarly priced, NVIDIA Nemotron Nano 12B v2 VL (Non-reasoning) for stronger benchmark performance, and NVIDIA Nemotron Nano 12B v2 VL (Non-reasoning) for faster generation. For latency-sensitive apps, check the TTFT comparison above.