Compare/Qwen3 14B (Reasoning) vs o4-mini (high)

Qwen3 14B (Reasoning)vso4-mini (high)

Side-by-side comparison of pricing, 12 benchmarks, and generation speed.

Alibaba

Qwen3 14B (Reasoning)

Input
$0.35/M
Output
$4.2/M
Speed
65 tok/s
TTFT
1.00s
OpenAI

o4-mini (high)

Input
$1.1/M
Output
$4.4/M
Speed
145 tok/s
TTFT
26.75s

Winner by Category

Cheaper
Qwen3 14B (Reasoning)
Faster (tok/s)
o4-mini (high)
Lower Latency
Qwen3 14B (Reasoning)
Benchmarks (0-12)
o4-mini (high)

Pricing Comparison

MetricQwen3 14B (Reasoning)o4-mini (high)
Input ($/M tokens)$0.35$1.1
Output ($/M tokens)$4.2$4.4
Cost for 1M input + 100K output tokens:
Qwen3 14B (Reasoning)$0.77
o4-mini (high)$1.54

Speed Comparison

Output Speed (tokens/s) — higher is better
Qwen3 14B (Reasoning)
65 tok/s
o4-mini (high)
145 tok/s
Time to First Token (seconds) — lower is better
Qwen3 14B (Reasoning)
1.00s
o4-mini (high)
26.75s

Benchmark Comparison

Data from Artificial Analysis API — 12 benchmarks

Intelligence Index
16.233.1
Coding Index
13.125.6
Math Index
55.790.7
GPQA Diamond
60.4%78.4%
MMLU-Pro
77.4%83.2%
LiveCodeBench
52.3%85.9%
AIME 2025
55.7%90.7%
MATH-500
96.1%98.9%
Humanity's Last Exam
4.3%17.5%
SciCode
31.6%46.5%
IFBench
40.5%68.7%
TerminalBench
3.8%15.2%
Qwen3 14B (Reasoning)0 wins
12 winso4-mini (high)

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is cheaper, Qwen3 14B (Reasoning) or o4-mini (high)?

Qwen3 14B (Reasoning) is cheaper overall. Its blended price (3:1 input/output ratio) is $1.31/M tokens vs $1.93/M for o4-mini (high).

Which model performs better on benchmarks?

o4-mini (high) wins 12 out of 12 benchmarks compared to 0 for Qwen3 14B (Reasoning). See the detailed benchmark chart above for per-category results.

Which is faster for real-time applications?

o4-mini (high) generates tokens faster at 145 tok/s vs 65 tok/s. Qwen3 14B (Reasoning) also has lower time-to-first-token (1.00s vs 26.75s).

When should I use Qwen3 14B (Reasoning) vs o4-mini (high)?

Choose based on your priorities: Qwen3 14B (Reasoning) for lower cost, o4-mini (high) for stronger benchmark performance, and o4-mini (high) for faster generation. For latency-sensitive apps, check the TTFT comparison above.