Side-by-side comparison of pricing, 12 benchmarks, and generation speed.
| Metric | Qwen3 14B (Non-reasoning) | Llama 3.2 Instruct 90B (Vision) |
|---|---|---|
| Input ($/M tokens) | $0.35 | $1.38 |
| Output ($/M tokens) | $1.4 | $1.38 |
Data from Artificial Analysis API — 12 benchmarks
Qwen3 14B (Non-reasoning) is cheaper overall. Its blended price (3:1 input/output ratio) is $0.61/M tokens vs $1.38/M for Llama 3.2 Instruct 90B (Vision).
Qwen3 14B (Non-reasoning) wins 10 out of 12 benchmarks compared to 1 for Llama 3.2 Instruct 90B (Vision). See the detailed benchmark chart above for per-category results.
Qwen3 14B (Non-reasoning) generates tokens faster at 62 tok/s vs 61 tok/s. However, Llama 3.2 Instruct 90B (Vision) has lower time-to-first-token (0.62s vs 1.15s).
Choose based on your priorities: Qwen3 14B (Non-reasoning) for lower cost, Qwen3 14B (Non-reasoning) for stronger benchmark performance, and Qwen3 14B (Non-reasoning) for faster generation. For latency-sensitive apps, check the TTFT comparison above.