Compare/Qwen3 235B A22B (Non-reasoning) vs GLM-4.5V (Non-reasoning)

Qwen3 235B A22B (Non-reasoning)vsGLM-4.5V (Non-reasoning)

Side-by-side comparison of pricing, 12 benchmarks, and generation speed.

Alibaba

Qwen3 235B A22B (Non-reasoning)

Input
$0.45/M
Output
$1.8/M
Speed
68 tok/s
TTFT
1.23s
Z AI

GLM-4.5V (Non-reasoning)

Input
$0.6/M
Output
$1.8/M
Speed
53 tok/s
TTFT
27.09s

Winner by Category

Cheaper
Qwen3 235B A22B (Non-reasoning)
Faster (tok/s)
Qwen3 235B A22B (Non-reasoning)
Lower Latency
Qwen3 235B A22B (Non-reasoning)
Benchmarks (10-2)
Qwen3 235B A22B (Non-reasoning)

Pricing Comparison

MetricQwen3 235B A22B (Non-reasoning)GLM-4.5V (Non-reasoning)
Input ($/M tokens)$0.45$0.6
Output ($/M tokens)$1.8$1.8
Cost for 1M input + 100K output tokens:
Qwen3 235B A22B (Non-reasoning)$0.63
GLM-4.5V (Non-reasoning)$0.78

Speed Comparison

Output Speed (tokens/s) — higher is better
Qwen3 235B A22B (Non-reasoning)
68 tok/s
GLM-4.5V (Non-reasoning)
53 tok/s
Time to First Token (seconds) — lower is better
Qwen3 235B A22B (Non-reasoning)
1.23s
GLM-4.5V (Non-reasoning)
27.09s

Benchmark Comparison

Data from Artificial Analysis API — 12 benchmarks

Intelligence Index
17.012.7
Coding Index
14.010.8
Math Index
23.715.3
GPQA Diamond
61.3%57.3%
MMLU-Pro
76.2%75.1%
LiveCodeBench
34.3%35.2%
AIME 2025
23.7%15.3%
MATH-500
90.2%
Humanity's Last Exam
4.7%3.6%
SciCode
29.9%18.8%
IFBench
36.6%28.6%
TerminalBench
6.1%6.8%
Qwen3 235B A22B (Non-reasoning)10 wins
2 winsGLM-4.5V (Non-reasoning)

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is cheaper, Qwen3 235B A22B (Non-reasoning) or GLM-4.5V (Non-reasoning)?

Qwen3 235B A22B (Non-reasoning) is cheaper overall. Its blended price (3:1 input/output ratio) is $0.79/M tokens vs $0.90/M for GLM-4.5V (Non-reasoning).

Which model performs better on benchmarks?

Qwen3 235B A22B (Non-reasoning) wins 10 out of 12 benchmarks compared to 2 for GLM-4.5V (Non-reasoning). See the detailed benchmark chart above for per-category results.

Which is faster for real-time applications?

Qwen3 235B A22B (Non-reasoning) generates tokens faster at 68 tok/s vs 53 tok/s. Qwen3 235B A22B (Non-reasoning) also has lower time-to-first-token (1.23s vs 27.09s).

When should I use Qwen3 235B A22B (Non-reasoning) vs GLM-4.5V (Non-reasoning)?

Choose based on your priorities: Qwen3 235B A22B (Non-reasoning) for lower cost, Qwen3 235B A22B (Non-reasoning) for stronger benchmark performance, and Qwen3 235B A22B (Non-reasoning) for faster generation. For latency-sensitive apps, check the TTFT comparison above.