Side-by-side comparison of pricing, 12 benchmarks, and generation speed.
| Metric | Qwen3 30B A3B 2507 Instruct | Llama Nemotron Super 49B v1.5 (Reasoning) |
|---|---|---|
| Input ($/M tokens) | $0.15 | $0.1 |
| Output ($/M tokens) | $0.4 | $0.4 |
Data from Artificial Analysis API — 12 benchmarks
Llama Nemotron Super 49B v1.5 (Reasoning) is cheaper overall. Its blended price (3:1 input/output ratio) is $0.17/M tokens vs $0.21/M for Qwen3 30B A3B 2507 Instruct.
Llama Nemotron Super 49B v1.5 (Reasoning) wins 10 out of 12 benchmarks compared to 1 for Qwen3 30B A3B 2507 Instruct. See the detailed benchmark chart above for per-category results.
Qwen3 30B A3B 2507 Instruct generates tokens faster at 129 tok/s vs 50 tok/s. However, Llama Nemotron Super 49B v1.5 (Reasoning) has lower time-to-first-token (0.31s vs 1.16s).
Choose based on your priorities: Llama Nemotron Super 49B v1.5 (Reasoning) for lower cost, Llama Nemotron Super 49B v1.5 (Reasoning) for stronger benchmark performance, and Qwen3 30B A3B 2507 Instruct for faster generation. For latency-sensitive apps, check the TTFT comparison above.