Side-by-side comparison of pricing, 12 benchmarks, and generation speed.
| Metric | Qwen3 32B (Non-reasoning) | NVIDIA Nemotron Nano 12B v2 VL (Non-reasoning) |
|---|---|---|
| Input ($/M tokens) | $0.15 | $0.2 |
| Output ($/M tokens) | $0.59 | $0.6 |
Data from Artificial Analysis API — 12 benchmarks
Qwen3 32B (Non-reasoning) is cheaper overall. Its blended price (3:1 input/output ratio) is $0.26/M tokens vs $0.30/M for NVIDIA Nemotron Nano 12B v2 VL (Non-reasoning).
It's a tie — both models win 6 benchmarks each across 12 evaluated categories. See the detailed benchmark chart above for per-category results.
NVIDIA Nemotron Nano 12B v2 VL (Non-reasoning) generates tokens faster at 230 tok/s vs 102 tok/s. However, NVIDIA Nemotron Nano 12B v2 VL (Non-reasoning) has lower time-to-first-token (0.63s vs 1.10s).
Choose based on your priorities: Qwen3 32B (Non-reasoning) for lower cost, both perform similarly on benchmarks, and NVIDIA Nemotron Nano 12B v2 VL (Non-reasoning) for faster generation. For latency-sensitive apps, check the TTFT comparison above.