Compare/Qwen3 4B 2507 Instruct vs Grok-1

Qwen3 4B 2507 InstructvsGrok-1

Side-by-side comparison of pricing, 12 benchmarks, and generation speed.

Alibaba

Qwen3 4B 2507 Instruct

Input
$0/M
Output
$0/M
Speed
TTFT
xAI

Grok-1

Input
$0/M
Output
$0/M
Speed
TTFT

Winner by Category

Cheaper
Tie
Faster (tok/s)
Tie
Lower Latency
Tie
Benchmarks (11-0)
Qwen3 4B 2507 Instruct

Pricing Comparison

MetricQwen3 4B 2507 InstructGrok-1
Input ($/M tokens)$0$0
Output ($/M tokens)$0$0
Cost for 1M input + 100K output tokens:
Qwen3 4B 2507 Instruct$0.00
Grok-1$0.00

Speed Comparison

Speed data not available for these models.

Benchmark Comparison

Data from Artificial Analysis API — 12 benchmarks

Intelligence Index
12.911.7
Coding Index
9.0
Math Index
52.3
GPQA Diamond
51.7%
MMLU-Pro
67.2%
LiveCodeBench
37.7%
AIME 2025
52.3%
MATH-500
Humanity's Last Exam
4.7%
SciCode
18.1%
IFBench
33.5%
TerminalBench
4.5%
Qwen3 4B 2507 Instruct11 wins
0 winsGrok-1

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is cheaper, Qwen3 4B 2507 Instruct or Grok-1?

Both models have similar pricing. Check the detailed breakdown above for input vs output token costs.

Which model performs better on benchmarks?

Qwen3 4B 2507 Instruct wins 11 out of 12 benchmarks compared to 0 for Grok-1. See the detailed benchmark chart above for per-category results.

Which is faster for real-time applications?

Both models have comparable generation speeds.

When should I use Qwen3 4B 2507 Instruct vs Grok-1?

Choose based on your priorities: both are similarly priced, Qwen3 4B 2507 Instruct for stronger benchmark performance, and both have comparable speed. For latency-sensitive apps, check the TTFT comparison above.