Side-by-side comparison of pricing, 12 benchmarks, and generation speed.
| Metric | Qwen3.5 122B A10B (Reasoning) | Hermes 4 - Llama-3.1 405B (Non-reasoning) |
|---|---|---|
| Input ($/M tokens) | $0.4 | $1 |
| Output ($/M tokens) | $3.2 | $3 |
Data from Artificial Analysis API — 12 benchmarks
Qwen3.5 122B A10B (Reasoning) is cheaper overall. Its blended price (3:1 input/output ratio) is $1.10/M tokens vs $1.50/M for Hermes 4 - Llama-3.1 405B (Non-reasoning).
Qwen3.5 122B A10B (Reasoning) wins 7 out of 12 benchmarks compared to 4 for Hermes 4 - Llama-3.1 405B (Non-reasoning). See the detailed benchmark chart above for per-category results.
Qwen3.5 122B A10B (Reasoning) generates tokens faster at 143 tok/s vs 39 tok/s. However, Hermes 4 - Llama-3.1 405B (Non-reasoning) has lower time-to-first-token (0.76s vs 1.23s).
Choose based on your priorities: Qwen3.5 122B A10B (Reasoning) for lower cost, Qwen3.5 122B A10B (Reasoning) for stronger benchmark performance, and Qwen3.5 122B A10B (Reasoning) for faster generation. For latency-sensitive apps, check the TTFT comparison above.