Side-by-side comparison of pricing, 12 benchmarks, and generation speed.
| Metric | Qwen3.5 9B (Non-reasoning) | NVIDIA Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B (Non-reasoning) |
|---|---|---|
| Input ($/M tokens) | $0.04 | $0.05 |
| Output ($/M tokens) | $0.2 | $0.2 |
Data from Artificial Analysis API — 12 benchmarks
Qwen3.5 9B (Non-reasoning) is cheaper overall. Its blended price (3:1 input/output ratio) is $0.08/M tokens vs $0.09/M for NVIDIA Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B (Non-reasoning).
Qwen3.5 9B (Non-reasoning) wins 7 out of 12 benchmarks compared to 4 for NVIDIA Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B (Non-reasoning). See the detailed benchmark chart above for per-category results.
Qwen3.5 9B (Non-reasoning) generates tokens faster at 178 tok/s vs 86 tok/s. However, NVIDIA Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B (Non-reasoning) has lower time-to-first-token (0.24s vs 0.54s).
Choose based on your priorities: Qwen3.5 9B (Non-reasoning) for lower cost, Qwen3.5 9B (Non-reasoning) for stronger benchmark performance, and Qwen3.5 9B (Non-reasoning) for faster generation. For latency-sensitive apps, check the TTFT comparison above.