Compare/Qwen3.5 9B (Non-reasoning) vs o3

Qwen3.5 9B (Non-reasoning)vso3

Side-by-side comparison of pricing, 12 benchmarks, and generation speed.

Alibaba

Qwen3.5 9B (Non-reasoning)

Input
$0/M
Output
$0/M
Speed
TTFT
OpenAI

o3

Input
$2/M
Output
$8/M
Speed
125 tok/s
TTFT
6.65s

Winner by Category

Cheaper
Qwen3.5 9B (Non-reasoning)
Faster (tok/s)
o3
Lower Latency
Qwen3.5 9B (Non-reasoning)
Benchmarks (1-11)
o3

Pricing Comparison

MetricQwen3.5 9B (Non-reasoning)o3
Input ($/M tokens)$0$2
Output ($/M tokens)$0$8
Cost for 1M input + 100K output tokens:
Qwen3.5 9B (Non-reasoning)$0.00
o3$2.80

Speed Comparison

Output Speed (tokens/s) — higher is better
Qwen3.5 9B (Non-reasoning)
o3
125 tok/s
Time to First Token (seconds) — lower is better
Qwen3.5 9B (Non-reasoning)
o3
6.65s

Benchmark Comparison

Data from Artificial Analysis API — 12 benchmarks

Intelligence Index
20.330.4
Coding Index
23.5
Math Index
88.3
GPQA Diamond
78.6%82.7%
MMLU-Pro
85.3%
LiveCodeBench
80.8%
AIME 2025
88.3%
MATH-500
99.2%
Humanity's Last Exam
8.6%20.0%
SciCode
27.7%41.0%
IFBench
37.8%71.4%
TerminalBench
18.2%37.1%
Qwen3.5 9B (Non-reasoning)1 wins
11 winso3

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is cheaper, Qwen3.5 9B (Non-reasoning) or o3?

Qwen3.5 9B (Non-reasoning) is cheaper overall. Its blended price (3:1 input/output ratio) is $0.00/M tokens vs $3.50/M for o3.

Which model performs better on benchmarks?

o3 wins 11 out of 12 benchmarks compared to 1 for Qwen3.5 9B (Non-reasoning). See the detailed benchmark chart above for per-category results.

Which is faster for real-time applications?

o3 generates tokens faster at 125 tok/s vs 0 tok/s. Qwen3.5 9B (Non-reasoning) also has lower time-to-first-token (0.00s vs 6.65s).

When should I use Qwen3.5 9B (Non-reasoning) vs o3?

Choose based on your priorities: Qwen3.5 9B (Non-reasoning) for lower cost, o3 for stronger benchmark performance, and o3 for faster generation. For latency-sensitive apps, check the TTFT comparison above.