Side-by-side comparison of pricing, 12 benchmarks, and generation speed.
| Metric | Qwen3.6 Plus | MiMo-V2.5-Pro |
|---|---|---|
| Input ($/M tokens) | $0.5 | $1 |
| Output ($/M tokens) | $3 | $3 |
Data from Artificial Analysis API — 12 benchmarks
Qwen3.6 Plus is cheaper overall. Its blended price (3:1 input/output ratio) is $1.13/M tokens vs $1.50/M for MiMo-V2.5-Pro.
MiMo-V2.5-Pro wins 5 out of 12 benchmarks compared to 2 for Qwen3.6 Plus. See the detailed benchmark chart above for per-category results.
MiMo-V2.5-Pro generates tokens faster at 57 tok/s vs 52 tok/s. Qwen3.6 Plus also has lower time-to-first-token (1.77s vs 2.02s).
Choose based on your priorities: Qwen3.6 Plus for lower cost, MiMo-V2.5-Pro for stronger benchmark performance, and MiMo-V2.5-Pro for faster generation. For latency-sensitive apps, check the TTFT comparison above.