Compare/Qwen3.7 Max vs Jamba 1.7 Large

Qwen3.7 MaxvsJamba 1.7 Large

Side-by-side comparison of pricing, 12 benchmarks, and generation speed.

Alibaba

Qwen3.7 Max

Input
$2.5/M
Output
$7.5/M
Speed
201 tok/s
TTFT
1.57s
AI21 Labs

Jamba 1.7 Large

Input
$2/M
Output
$8/M
Speed
53 tok/s
TTFT
0.83s

Winner by Category

Cheaper
Jamba 1.7 Large
Faster (tok/s)
Qwen3.7 Max
Lower Latency
Jamba 1.7 Large
Benchmarks (7-5)
Qwen3.7 Max

Pricing Comparison

MetricQwen3.7 MaxJamba 1.7 Large
Input ($/M tokens)$2.5$2
Output ($/M tokens)$7.5$8
Cost for 1M input + 100K output tokens:
Qwen3.7 Max$3.25
Jamba 1.7 Large$2.80

Speed Comparison

Output Speed (tokens/s) — higher is better
Qwen3.7 Max
201 tok/s
Jamba 1.7 Large
53 tok/s
Time to First Token (seconds) — lower is better
Qwen3.7 Max
1.57s
Jamba 1.7 Large
0.83s

Benchmark Comparison

Data from Artificial Analysis API — 12 benchmarks

Intelligence Index
46.05.3
Coding Index
66.0
Math Index
2.3
GPQA Diamond
92.3%39.0%
MMLU-Pro
57.7%
LiveCodeBench
18.1%
AIME 2025
2.3%
MATH-500
60.0%
Humanity's Last Exam
38.1%3.8%
SciCode
48.8%18.8%
IFBench
80.5%35.2%
TerminalBench
50.8%2.3%
Qwen3.7 Max7 wins
5 winsJamba 1.7 Large

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is cheaper, Qwen3.7 Max or Jamba 1.7 Large?

Jamba 1.7 Large is cheaper overall. Its blended price (3:1 input/output ratio) is $3.50/M tokens vs $3.75/M for Qwen3.7 Max.

Which model performs better on benchmarks?

Qwen3.7 Max wins 7 out of 12 benchmarks compared to 5 for Jamba 1.7 Large. See the detailed benchmark chart above for per-category results.

Which is faster for real-time applications?

Qwen3.7 Max generates tokens faster at 201 tok/s vs 53 tok/s. However, Jamba 1.7 Large has lower time-to-first-token (0.83s vs 1.57s).

When should I use Qwen3.7 Max vs Jamba 1.7 Large?

Choose based on your priorities: Jamba 1.7 Large for lower cost, Qwen3.7 Max for stronger benchmark performance, and Qwen3.7 Max for faster generation. For latency-sensitive apps, check the TTFT comparison above.