Side-by-side comparison of pricing, 12 benchmarks, and generation speed.
| Metric | Qwen3 8B (Non-reasoning) | Olmo 3 7B Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| Input ($/M tokens) | $0.18 | $0.1 |
| Output ($/M tokens) | $0.2 | $0.2 |
Data from Artificial Analysis API — 12 benchmarks
Olmo 3 7B Instruct is cheaper overall. Its blended price (3:1 input/output ratio) is $0.13/M tokens vs $0.18/M for Qwen3 8B (Non-reasoning).
Qwen3 8B (Non-reasoning) wins 7 out of 12 benchmarks compared to 5 for Olmo 3 7B Instruct. See the detailed benchmark chart above for per-category results.
Qwen3 8B (Non-reasoning) generates tokens faster at 92 tok/s vs 0 tok/s. However, Olmo 3 7B Instruct has lower time-to-first-token (0.00s vs 1.00s).
Choose based on your priorities: Olmo 3 7B Instruct for lower cost, Qwen3 8B (Non-reasoning) for stronger benchmark performance, and Qwen3 8B (Non-reasoning) for faster generation. For latency-sensitive apps, check the TTFT comparison above.