Side-by-side comparison of pricing, 12 benchmarks, and generation speed.
| Metric | Qwen3 Coder 30B A3B Instruct | Trinity Large Thinking |
|---|---|---|
| Input ($/M tokens) | $0.19 | $0.235 |
| Output ($/M tokens) | $0.839 | $0.875 |
Data from Artificial Analysis API — 12 benchmarks
Qwen3 Coder 30B A3B Instruct is cheaper overall. Its blended price (3:1 input/output ratio) is $0.35/M tokens vs $0.40/M for Trinity Large Thinking.
Trinity Large Thinking wins 7 out of 12 benchmarks compared to 5 for Qwen3 Coder 30B A3B Instruct. See the detailed benchmark chart above for per-category results.
Trinity Large Thinking generates tokens faster at 134 tok/s vs 106 tok/s. However, Trinity Large Thinking has lower time-to-first-token (0.63s vs 1.48s).
Choose based on your priorities: Qwen3 Coder 30B A3B Instruct for lower cost, Trinity Large Thinking for stronger benchmark performance, and Trinity Large Thinking for faster generation. For latency-sensitive apps, check the TTFT comparison above.