Side-by-side comparison of pricing, 12 benchmarks, and generation speed.
| Metric | Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct | GLM-4.5V (Non-reasoning) |
|---|---|---|
| Input ($/M tokens) | $0.3 | $0.6 |
| Output ($/M tokens) | $1.9 | $1.8 |
Data from Artificial Analysis API — 12 benchmarks
Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct is cheaper overall. Its blended price (3:1 input/output ratio) is $0.70/M tokens vs $0.90/M for GLM-4.5V (Non-reasoning).
Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct wins 10 out of 12 benchmarks compared to 0 for GLM-4.5V (Non-reasoning). See the detailed benchmark chart above for per-category results.
GLM-4.5V (Non-reasoning) generates tokens faster at 49 tok/s vs 48 tok/s. Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct also has lower time-to-first-token (1.07s vs 29.70s).
Choose based on your priorities: Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct for lower cost, Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct for stronger benchmark performance, and GLM-4.5V (Non-reasoning) for faster generation. For latency-sensitive apps, check the TTFT comparison above.