Side-by-side comparison of pricing, 12 benchmarks, and generation speed.
| Metric | QwQ 32B | ERNIE 4.5 300B A47B |
|---|---|---|
| Input ($/M tokens) | $0.66 | $0.28 |
| Output ($/M tokens) | $1 | $1.1 |
Data from Artificial Analysis API — 12 benchmarks
ERNIE 4.5 300B A47B is cheaper overall. Its blended price (3:1 input/output ratio) is $0.48/M tokens vs $0.74/M for QwQ 32B.
ERNIE 4.5 300B A47B wins 7 out of 12 benchmarks compared to 5 for QwQ 32B. See the detailed benchmark chart above for per-category results.
QwQ 32B generates tokens faster at 33 tok/s vs 30 tok/s. QwQ 32B also has lower time-to-first-token (0.45s vs 1.90s).
Choose based on your priorities: ERNIE 4.5 300B A47B for lower cost, ERNIE 4.5 300B A47B for stronger benchmark performance, and QwQ 32B for faster generation. For latency-sensitive apps, check the TTFT comparison above.