Side-by-side comparison of pricing, 12 benchmarks, and generation speed.
| Metric | QwQ 32B | GLM-4.6V (Reasoning) |
|---|---|---|
| Input ($/M tokens) | $0.66 | $0.3 |
| Output ($/M tokens) | $1 | $0.9 |
Data from Artificial Analysis API — 12 benchmarks
GLM-4.6V (Reasoning) is cheaper overall. Its blended price (3:1 input/output ratio) is $0.45/M tokens vs $0.74/M for QwQ 32B.
GLM-4.6V (Reasoning) wins 8 out of 12 benchmarks compared to 4 for QwQ 32B. See the detailed benchmark chart above for per-category results.
QwQ 32B generates tokens faster at 33 tok/s vs 23 tok/s. QwQ 32B also has lower time-to-first-token (0.45s vs 1.01s).
Choose based on your priorities: GLM-4.6V (Reasoning) for lower cost, GLM-4.6V (Reasoning) for stronger benchmark performance, and QwQ 32B for faster generation. For latency-sensitive apps, check the TTFT comparison above.