Side-by-side comparison of pricing, 12 benchmarks, and generation speed.
| Metric | Reka Flash (Sep '24) | Qwen3 235B A22B 2507 Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| Input ($/M tokens) | $0.2 | $0.2 |
| Output ($/M tokens) | $0.8 | $0.825 |
Data from Artificial Analysis API — 12 benchmarks
Reka Flash (Sep '24) is cheaper overall. Its blended price (3:1 input/output ratio) is $0.35/M tokens vs $0.36/M for Qwen3 235B A22B 2507 Instruct.
Qwen3 235B A22B 2507 Instruct wins 12 out of 12 benchmarks compared to 0 for Reka Flash (Sep '24). See the detailed benchmark chart above for per-category results.
Reka Flash (Sep '24) generates tokens faster at 86 tok/s vs 67 tok/s. However, Qwen3 235B A22B 2507 Instruct has lower time-to-first-token (1.26s vs 1.80s).
Choose based on your priorities: Reka Flash (Sep '24) for lower cost, Qwen3 235B A22B 2507 Instruct for stronger benchmark performance, and Reka Flash (Sep '24) for faster generation. For latency-sensitive apps, check the TTFT comparison above.