Compare/Ring-1T vs o3

Ring-1Tvso3

Side-by-side comparison of pricing, 12 benchmarks, and generation speed.

InclusionAI

Ring-1T

Input
$0/M
Output
$0/M
Speed
—
TTFT
—
OpenAI

o3

Input
$2/M
Output
$8/M
Speed
125 tok/s
TTFT
6.65s

Winner by Category

Cheaper
Ring-1T
Faster (tok/s)
o3
Lower Latency
Ring-1T
Benchmarks (2-9)
o3

Pricing Comparison

MetricRing-1To3
Input ($/M tokens)$0$2
Output ($/M tokens)$0$8
Cost for 1M input + 100K output tokens:
Ring-1T$0.00
o3$2.80

Speed Comparison

Output Speed (tokens/s) — higher is better
Ring-1T
—
o3
125 tok/s
Time to First Token (seconds) — lower is better
Ring-1T
—
o3
6.65s

Benchmark Comparison

Data from Artificial Analysis API — 12 benchmarks

Intelligence Index
16.230.4
Coding Index
——
Math Index
89.388.3
GPQA Diamond
77.4%82.7%
MMLU-Pro
80.6%85.3%
LiveCodeBench
64.3%80.8%
AIME 2025
89.3%88.3%
MATH-500
—99.2%
Humanity's Last Exam
10.2%20.0%
SciCode
36.7%41.0%
IFBench
44.6%71.4%
TerminalBench
6.8%37.1%
Ring-1T2 wins
9 winso3

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is cheaper, Ring-1T or o3?

Ring-1T is cheaper overall. Its blended price (3:1 input/output ratio) is $0.00/M tokens vs $3.50/M for o3.

Which model performs better on benchmarks?

o3 wins 9 out of 12 benchmarks compared to 2 for Ring-1T. See the detailed benchmark chart above for per-category results.

Which is faster for real-time applications?

o3 generates tokens faster at 125 tok/s vs 0 tok/s. Ring-1T also has lower time-to-first-token (0.00s vs 6.65s).

When should I use Ring-1T vs o3?

Choose based on your priorities: Ring-1T for lower cost, o3 for stronger benchmark performance, and o3 for faster generation. For latency-sensitive apps, check the TTFT comparison above.

More Comparisons

← All comparisons·Full benchmark table·Cost calculator