Compare/Ring-2.6-1T vs Grok 4.3 (medium)

Ring-2.6-1TvsGrok 4.3 (medium)

Side-by-side comparison of pricing, 12 benchmarks, and generation speed.

InclusionAI

Ring-2.6-1T

Input
$0.3/M
Output
$2.5/M
Speed
125 tok/s
TTFT
1.79s
SpaceXAI

Grok 4.3 (medium)

Input
$1.25/M
Output
$2.5/M
Speed
103 tok/s
TTFT
21.73s

Winner by Category

Cheaper
Ring-2.6-1T
Faster (tok/s)
Ring-2.6-1T
Lower Latency
Ring-2.6-1T
Benchmarks (1-6)
Grok 4.3 (medium)

Pricing Comparison

MetricRing-2.6-1TGrok 4.3 (medium)
Input ($/M tokens)$0.3$1.25
Output ($/M tokens)$2.5$2.5
Cost for 1M input + 100K output tokens:
Ring-2.6-1T$0.55
Grok 4.3 (medium)$1.50

Speed Comparison

Output Speed (tokens/s) — higher is better
Ring-2.6-1T
125 tok/s
Grok 4.3 (medium)
103 tok/s
Time to First Token (seconds) — lower is better
Ring-2.6-1T
1.79s
Grok 4.3 (medium)
21.73s

Benchmark Comparison

Data from Artificial Analysis API — 12 benchmarks

Intelligence Index
30.636.0
Coding Index
42.8
Math Index
GPQA Diamond
85.7%89.0%
MMLU-Pro
LiveCodeBench
AIME 2025
MATH-500
Humanity's Last Exam
18.3%28.1%
SciCode
42.4%44.6%
IFBench
44.6%83.3%
TerminalBench
28.8%30.3%
Ring-2.6-1T1 wins
6 winsGrok 4.3 (medium)

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is cheaper, Ring-2.6-1T or Grok 4.3 (medium)?

Ring-2.6-1T is cheaper overall. Its blended price (3:1 input/output ratio) is $0.85/M tokens vs $1.56/M for Grok 4.3 (medium).

Which model performs better on benchmarks?

Grok 4.3 (medium) wins 6 out of 12 benchmarks compared to 1 for Ring-2.6-1T. See the detailed benchmark chart above for per-category results.

Which is faster for real-time applications?

Ring-2.6-1T generates tokens faster at 125 tok/s vs 103 tok/s. Ring-2.6-1T also has lower time-to-first-token (1.79s vs 21.73s).

When should I use Ring-2.6-1T vs Grok 4.3 (medium)?

Choose based on your priorities: Ring-2.6-1T for lower cost, Grok 4.3 (medium) for stronger benchmark performance, and Ring-2.6-1T for faster generation. For latency-sensitive apps, check the TTFT comparison above.