Compare/Sarvam 30B (high) vs GPT-5.4 (Non-reasoning)

Sarvam 30B (high)vsGPT-5.4 (Non-reasoning)

Side-by-side comparison of pricing, 12 benchmarks, and generation speed.

Sarvam

Sarvam 30B (high)

Input
$0/M
Output
$0/M
Speed
182 tok/s
TTFT
1.15s
OpenAI

GPT-5.4 (Non-reasoning)

Input
$2.5/M
Output
$15/M
Speed
61 tok/s
TTFT
0.65s

Winner by Category

Cheaper
Sarvam 30B (high)
Faster (tok/s)
Sarvam 30B (high)
Lower Latency
GPT-5.4 (Non-reasoning)
Benchmarks (0-7)
GPT-5.4 (Non-reasoning)

Pricing Comparison

MetricSarvam 30B (high)GPT-5.4 (Non-reasoning)
Input ($/M tokens)$0$2.5
Output ($/M tokens)$0$15
Cost for 1M input + 100K output tokens:
Sarvam 30B (high)$0.00
GPT-5.4 (Non-reasoning)$4.00

Speed Comparison

Output Speed (tokens/s) — higher is better
Sarvam 30B (high)
182 tok/s
GPT-5.4 (Non-reasoning)
61 tok/s
Time to First Token (seconds) — lower is better
Sarvam 30B (high)
1.15s
GPT-5.4 (Non-reasoning)
0.65s

Benchmark Comparison

Data from Artificial Analysis API — 12 benchmarks

Intelligence Index
12.335.4
Coding Index
7.941.0
Math Index
GPQA Diamond
63.3%74.8%
MMLU-Pro
LiveCodeBench
AIME 2025
MATH-500
Humanity's Last Exam
7.0%10.6%
SciCode
19.2%47.1%
IFBench
26.5%48.4%
TerminalBench
2.3%37.9%
Sarvam 30B (high)0 wins
7 winsGPT-5.4 (Non-reasoning)

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is cheaper, Sarvam 30B (high) or GPT-5.4 (Non-reasoning)?

Sarvam 30B (high) is cheaper overall. Its blended price (3:1 input/output ratio) is $0.00/M tokens vs $5.63/M for GPT-5.4 (Non-reasoning).

Which model performs better on benchmarks?

GPT-5.4 (Non-reasoning) wins 7 out of 12 benchmarks compared to 0 for Sarvam 30B (high). See the detailed benchmark chart above for per-category results.

Which is faster for real-time applications?

Sarvam 30B (high) generates tokens faster at 182 tok/s vs 61 tok/s. However, GPT-5.4 (Non-reasoning) has lower time-to-first-token (0.65s vs 1.15s).

When should I use Sarvam 30B (high) vs GPT-5.4 (Non-reasoning)?

Choose based on your priorities: Sarvam 30B (high) for lower cost, GPT-5.4 (Non-reasoning) for stronger benchmark performance, and Sarvam 30B (high) for faster generation. For latency-sensitive apps, check the TTFT comparison above.