Compare/Sarvam 30B (high) vs Grok-1

Sarvam 30B (high)vsGrok-1

Side-by-side comparison of pricing, 12 benchmarks, and generation speed.

Sarvam

Sarvam 30B (high)

Input
$0/M
Output
$0/M
Speed
182 tok/s
TTFT
1.15s
xAI

Grok-1

Input
$0/M
Output
$0/M
Speed
TTFT

Winner by Category

Cheaper
Tie
Faster (tok/s)
Sarvam 30B (high)
Lower Latency
Grok-1
Benchmarks (7-0)
Sarvam 30B (high)

Pricing Comparison

MetricSarvam 30B (high)Grok-1
Input ($/M tokens)$0$0
Output ($/M tokens)$0$0
Cost for 1M input + 100K output tokens:
Sarvam 30B (high)$0.00
Grok-1$0.00

Speed Comparison

Output Speed (tokens/s) — higher is better
Sarvam 30B (high)
182 tok/s
Grok-1
Time to First Token (seconds) — lower is better
Sarvam 30B (high)
1.15s
Grok-1

Benchmark Comparison

Data from Artificial Analysis API — 12 benchmarks

Intelligence Index
12.311.7
Coding Index
7.9
Math Index
GPQA Diamond
63.3%
MMLU-Pro
LiveCodeBench
AIME 2025
MATH-500
Humanity's Last Exam
7.0%
SciCode
19.2%
IFBench
26.5%
TerminalBench
2.3%
Sarvam 30B (high)7 wins
0 winsGrok-1

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is cheaper, Sarvam 30B (high) or Grok-1?

Both models have similar pricing. Check the detailed breakdown above for input vs output token costs.

Which model performs better on benchmarks?

Sarvam 30B (high) wins 7 out of 12 benchmarks compared to 0 for Grok-1. See the detailed benchmark chart above for per-category results.

Which is faster for real-time applications?

Sarvam 30B (high) generates tokens faster at 182 tok/s vs 0 tok/s. However, Grok-1 has lower time-to-first-token (0.00s vs 1.15s).

When should I use Sarvam 30B (high) vs Grok-1?

Choose based on your priorities: both are similarly priced, Sarvam 30B (high) for stronger benchmark performance, and Sarvam 30B (high) for faster generation. For latency-sensitive apps, check the TTFT comparison above.