Compare/Solar Mini vs Llama 3.2 Instruct 3B

Solar MinivsLlama 3.2 Instruct 3B

Side-by-side comparison of pricing, 12 benchmarks, and generation speed.

Upstage

Solar Mini

Input
$0.15/M
Output
$0.15/M
Speed
62 tok/s
TTFT
0.95s
Meta

Llama 3.2 Instruct 3B

Input
$0.15/M
Output
$0.15/M
Speed
51 tok/s
TTFT
0.69s

Winner by Category

Cheaper
Tie
Faster (tok/s)
Solar Mini
Lower Latency
Llama 3.2 Instruct 3B
Benchmarks (1-9)
Llama 3.2 Instruct 3B

Pricing Comparison

MetricSolar MiniLlama 3.2 Instruct 3B
Input ($/M tokens)$0.15$0.15
Output ($/M tokens)$0.15$0.15
Cost for 1M input + 100K output tokens:
Solar Mini$0.16
Llama 3.2 Instruct 3B$0.16

Speed Comparison

Output Speed (tokens/s) — higher is better
Solar Mini
62 tok/s
Llama 3.2 Instruct 3B
51 tok/s
Time to First Token (seconds) — lower is better
Solar Mini
0.95s
Llama 3.2 Instruct 3B
0.69s

Benchmark Comparison

Data from Artificial Analysis API — 12 benchmarks

Intelligence Index
11.99.7
Coding Index
Math Index
3.3
GPQA Diamond
25.5%
MMLU-Pro
34.7%
LiveCodeBench
8.3%
AIME 2025
3.3%
MATH-500
33.1%48.9%
Humanity's Last Exam
5.2%
SciCode
5.2%
IFBench
26.2%
TerminalBench
Solar Mini1 wins
9 winsLlama 3.2 Instruct 3B

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is cheaper, Solar Mini or Llama 3.2 Instruct 3B?

Both models have similar pricing. Check the detailed breakdown above for input vs output token costs.

Which model performs better on benchmarks?

Llama 3.2 Instruct 3B wins 9 out of 12 benchmarks compared to 1 for Solar Mini. See the detailed benchmark chart above for per-category results.

Which is faster for real-time applications?

Solar Mini generates tokens faster at 62 tok/s vs 51 tok/s. However, Llama 3.2 Instruct 3B has lower time-to-first-token (0.69s vs 0.95s).

When should I use Solar Mini vs Llama 3.2 Instruct 3B?

Choose based on your priorities: both are similarly priced, Llama 3.2 Instruct 3B for stronger benchmark performance, and Solar Mini for faster generation. For latency-sensitive apps, check the TTFT comparison above.