Advertisement
Compare/Agnes 3.0 Flash vs Solar Mini

Agnes 3.0 FlashvsSolar Mini

Side-by-side comparison of pricing, 12 benchmarks, and generation speed.

Sapiens AI

Agnes 3.0 Flash

Input
$0.05/M
Output
$0.15/M
Speed
237 tok/s
TTFT
1.84s
Upstage

Solar Mini

Input
$0.15/M
Output
$0.15/M
Speed
—
TTFT
—

Winner by Category

Cheaper
Agnes 3.0 Flash
Faster (tok/s)
Agnes 3.0 Flash
Lower Latency
Agnes 3.0 Flash
Benchmarks (1-0)
Agnes 3.0 Flash

Pricing Comparison

MetricAgnes 3.0 FlashSolar Mini
Input ($/M tokens)$0.05$0.15
Output ($/M tokens)$0.15$0.15
Cost for 1M input + 100K output tokens:
Agnes 3.0 Flash$0.07
Solar Mini$0.16

Speed Comparison

Output Speed (tokens/s) — higher is better
Agnes 3.0 Flash
237 tok/s
Solar Mini
—
Time to First Token (seconds) — lower is better
Agnes 3.0 Flash
1.84s
Solar Mini
—

Editorial Analysis

Verdict. Agnes 3.0 Flash wins the overall benchmark matchup 1–0 across 1 overlapping categories, but raw benchmark score is only one input to the decision.

Pricing. Both models sit in the budget bracket for output-token pricing. At 1.0× the per-million-token cost, Solar Mini is meaningfully cheaper if your traffic is output-heavy (long completions, document generation, agent loops). Solar Mini makes more sense when output volume is low and absolute reasoning quality justifies the premium.

Strengths. Agnes 3.0 Flash is strongest on Intelligence Index (35.5). Solar Mini leads on Intelligence Index (6.4).

Speed. Speed data is incomplete for this pair; benchmark and price should decide.

Provider. Sapiens AI and Upstage sell to overlapping but distinct developer audiences: Sapiens AI tends to ship frontier reasoning models with premium positioning, while Upstage often prices more aggressively. Your existing vendor relationships, billing, and SLA preferences may matter as much as the raw numbers above.

Workload cost. Workload scenarios (per million requests at 30M input + 15M output tokens): Agnes 3.0 Flash costs $3.75 ($45/year); Solar Mini costs $6.75 ($81/year). At a smaller 5M-input/2M-output scale (single-developer tool or prototype): Agnes 3.0 Flash ≈ $0.55/run, Solar Mini ≈ $1.05/run. At agent/realtime scale (200M input / 100M output per million requests): Agnes 3.0 Flash ≈ $25/run, Solar Mini ≈ $45/run. Agnes 3.0 Flash becomes more attractive at higher volume — the absolute per-token pricing difference compounds when you ship at scale.

Recommendation. Both models have legitimate use cases — the right answer depends on whether you are optimizing for benchmark ceiling, latency, or unit cost. Start with the cheaper / faster model, evaluate against your specific task, and only switch if the upgrade shows a meaningful lift.

Benchmark Comparison

Data from Artificial Analysis API — 12 benchmarks

Intelligence Index
35.56.4
Coding Index
——
Math Index
——
GPQA Diamond
——
MMLU-Pro
——
LiveCodeBench
——
AIME 2025
——
MATH-500
——
Humanity's Last Exam
——
SciCode
——
IFBench
——
TerminalBench
——
Agnes 3.0 Flash1 wins
0 winsSolar Mini

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is cheaper, Agnes 3.0 Flash or Solar Mini?

Agnes 3.0 Flash is cheaper overall. Its blended price (3:1 input/output ratio) is $0.07/M tokens vs $0.15/M for Solar Mini.

Which model performs better on benchmarks?

Agnes 3.0 Flash wins 1 out of 12 benchmarks compared to 0 for Solar Mini. See the detailed benchmark chart above for per-category results.

Which is faster for real-time applications?

Agnes 3.0 Flash generates tokens faster at 237 tok/s vs — tok/s. Agnes 3.0 Flash also has lower time-to-first-token (1.84s vs —s).

When should I use Agnes 3.0 Flash vs Solar Mini?

Choose based on your priorities: Agnes 3.0 Flash for lower cost, Agnes 3.0 Flash for stronger benchmark performance, and Agnes 3.0 Flash for faster generation. For latency-sensitive apps, check the TTFT comparison above.