Side-by-side comparison of pricing, 12 benchmarks, and generation speed.
| Metric | Claude 4.5 Haiku (Non-reasoning) | Qwen3.5 Omni Plus |
|---|---|---|
| Input ($/M tokens) | $1 | $0.4 |
| Output ($/M tokens) | $5 | $4.8 |
Data from Artificial Analysis API — 12 benchmarks
Qwen3.5 Omni Plus is cheaper overall. Its blended price (3:1 input/output ratio) is $1.50/M tokens vs $2.00/M for Claude 4.5 Haiku (Non-reasoning).
Claude 4.5 Haiku (Non-reasoning) wins 6 out of 12 benchmarks compared to 5 for Qwen3.5 Omni Plus. See the detailed benchmark chart above for per-category results.
Claude 4.5 Haiku (Non-reasoning) generates tokens faster at 100 tok/s vs 50 tok/s. Claude 4.5 Haiku (Non-reasoning) also has lower time-to-first-token (0.51s vs 1.32s).
Choose based on your priorities: Qwen3.5 Omni Plus for lower cost, Claude 4.5 Haiku (Non-reasoning) for stronger benchmark performance, and Claude 4.5 Haiku (Non-reasoning) for faster generation. For latency-sensitive apps, check the TTFT comparison above.