Compare/Claude 4 Opus (Non-reasoning) vs o1-preview

Claude 4 Opus (Non-reasoning)vso1-preview

Side-by-side comparison of pricing, 12 benchmarks, and generation speed.

Anthropic

Claude 4 Opus (Non-reasoning)

Input
$15/M
Output
$75/M
Speed
TTFT
OpenAI

o1-preview

Input
$16.5/M
Output
$66/M
Speed
TTFT

Winner by Category

Cheaper
o1-preview
Faster (tok/s)
Tie
Lower Latency
Tie
Benchmarks (10-1)
Claude 4 Opus (Non-reasoning)

Pricing Comparison

MetricClaude 4 Opus (Non-reasoning)o1-preview
Input ($/M tokens)$15$16.5
Output ($/M tokens)$75$66
Cost for 1M input + 100K output tokens:
Claude 4 Opus (Non-reasoning)$22.50
o1-preview$23.10

Speed Comparison

Speed data not available for these models.

Benchmark Comparison

Data from Artificial Analysis API — 12 benchmarks

Intelligence Index
25.517.0
Coding Index
34.0
Math Index
36.3
GPQA Diamond
70.1%
MMLU-Pro
86.0%
LiveCodeBench
54.2%
AIME 2025
36.3%
MATH-500
94.1%92.4%
Humanity's Last Exam
5.9%
SciCode
40.9%
IFBench
43.3%
TerminalBench
Claude 4 Opus (Non-reasoning)10 wins
1 winso1-preview

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is cheaper, Claude 4 Opus (Non-reasoning) or o1-preview?

o1-preview is cheaper overall. Its blended price (3:1 input/output ratio) is $28.88/M tokens vs $30.00/M for Claude 4 Opus (Non-reasoning).

Which model performs better on benchmarks?

Claude 4 Opus (Non-reasoning) wins 10 out of 12 benchmarks compared to 1 for o1-preview. See the detailed benchmark chart above for per-category results.

Which is faster for real-time applications?

Both models have comparable generation speeds.

When should I use Claude 4 Opus (Non-reasoning) vs o1-preview?

Choose based on your priorities: o1-preview for lower cost, Claude 4 Opus (Non-reasoning) for stronger benchmark performance, and both have comparable speed. For latency-sensitive apps, check the TTFT comparison above.