Compare/Command-R (Mar '24) vs Mistral Large 3

Command-R (Mar '24)vsMistral Large 3

Side-by-side comparison of pricing, 12 benchmarks, and generation speed.

Cohere

Command-R (Mar '24)

Input
$0.5/M
Output
$1.5/M
Speed
TTFT
Mistral

Mistral Large 3

Input
$0.5/M
Output
$1.5/M
Speed
57 tok/s
TTFT
0.53s

Winner by Category

Cheaper
Tie
Faster (tok/s)
Mistral Large 3
Lower Latency
Command-R (Mar '24)
Benchmarks (2-10)
Mistral Large 3

Pricing Comparison

MetricCommand-R (Mar '24)Mistral Large 3
Input ($/M tokens)$0.5$0.5
Output ($/M tokens)$1.5$1.5
Cost for 1M input + 100K output tokens:
Command-R (Mar '24)$0.65
Mistral Large 3$0.65

Speed Comparison

Output Speed (tokens/s) — higher is better
Command-R (Mar '24)
Mistral Large 3
57 tok/s
Time to First Token (seconds) — lower is better
Command-R (Mar '24)
Mistral Large 3
0.53s

Benchmark Comparison

Data from Artificial Analysis API — 12 benchmarks

Intelligence Index
7.422.8
Coding Index
22.7
Math Index
38.0
GPQA Diamond
28.4%68.0%
MMLU-Pro
33.8%80.7%
LiveCodeBench
4.8%46.5%
AIME 2025
38.0%
MATH-500
16.4%
Humanity's Last Exam
4.8%4.1%
SciCode
6.2%36.2%
IFBench
36.2%
TerminalBench
15.9%
Command-R (Mar '24)2 wins
10 winsMistral Large 3

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is cheaper, Command-R (Mar '24) or Mistral Large 3?

Both models have similar pricing. Check the detailed breakdown above for input vs output token costs.

Which model performs better on benchmarks?

Mistral Large 3 wins 10 out of 12 benchmarks compared to 2 for Command-R (Mar '24). See the detailed benchmark chart above for per-category results.

Which is faster for real-time applications?

Mistral Large 3 generates tokens faster at 57 tok/s vs 0 tok/s. Command-R (Mar '24) also has lower time-to-first-token (0.00s vs 0.53s).

When should I use Command-R (Mar '24) vs Mistral Large 3?

Choose based on your priorities: both are similarly priced, Mistral Large 3 for stronger benchmark performance, and Mistral Large 3 for faster generation. For latency-sensitive apps, check the TTFT comparison above.