Compare/DeepSeek V3.1 (Non-reasoning) vs GLM-4.5V (Non-reasoning)

DeepSeek V3.1 (Non-reasoning)vsGLM-4.5V (Non-reasoning)

Side-by-side comparison of pricing, 12 benchmarks, and generation speed.

DeepSeek

DeepSeek V3.1 (Non-reasoning)

Input
$0.56/M
Output
$1.68/M
Speed
TTFT
Z AI

GLM-4.5V (Non-reasoning)

Input
$0.6/M
Output
$1.8/M
Speed
69 tok/s
TTFT
26.97s

Winner by Category

Cheaper
DeepSeek V3.1 (Non-reasoning)
Faster (tok/s)
GLM-4.5V (Non-reasoning)
Lower Latency
DeepSeek V3.1 (Non-reasoning)
Benchmarks (11-0)
DeepSeek V3.1 (Non-reasoning)

Pricing Comparison

MetricDeepSeek V3.1 (Non-reasoning)GLM-4.5V (Non-reasoning)
Input ($/M tokens)$0.56$0.6
Output ($/M tokens)$1.68$1.8
Cost for 1M input + 100K output tokens:
DeepSeek V3.1 (Non-reasoning)$0.73
GLM-4.5V (Non-reasoning)$0.78

Speed Comparison

Output Speed (tokens/s) — higher is better
DeepSeek V3.1 (Non-reasoning)
GLM-4.5V (Non-reasoning)
69 tok/s
Time to First Token (seconds) — lower is better
DeepSeek V3.1 (Non-reasoning)
GLM-4.5V (Non-reasoning)
26.97s

Benchmark Comparison

Data from Artificial Analysis API — 12 benchmarks

Intelligence Index
28.112.7
Coding Index
28.410.8
Math Index
49.715.3
GPQA Diamond
73.5%57.3%
MMLU-Pro
83.3%75.1%
LiveCodeBench
57.7%35.2%
AIME 2025
49.7%15.3%
MATH-500
Humanity's Last Exam
6.3%3.6%
SciCode
36.7%18.8%
IFBench
37.8%28.6%
TerminalBench
24.2%6.8%
DeepSeek V3.1 (Non-reasoning)11 wins
0 winsGLM-4.5V (Non-reasoning)

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is cheaper, DeepSeek V3.1 (Non-reasoning) or GLM-4.5V (Non-reasoning)?

DeepSeek V3.1 (Non-reasoning) is cheaper overall. Its blended price (3:1 input/output ratio) is $0.84/M tokens vs $0.90/M for GLM-4.5V (Non-reasoning).

Which model performs better on benchmarks?

DeepSeek V3.1 (Non-reasoning) wins 11 out of 12 benchmarks compared to 0 for GLM-4.5V (Non-reasoning). See the detailed benchmark chart above for per-category results.

Which is faster for real-time applications?

GLM-4.5V (Non-reasoning) generates tokens faster at 69 tok/s vs 0 tok/s. DeepSeek V3.1 (Non-reasoning) also has lower time-to-first-token (0.00s vs 26.97s).

When should I use DeepSeek V3.1 (Non-reasoning) vs GLM-4.5V (Non-reasoning)?

Choose based on your priorities: DeepSeek V3.1 (Non-reasoning) for lower cost, DeepSeek V3.1 (Non-reasoning) for stronger benchmark performance, and GLM-4.5V (Non-reasoning) for faster generation. For latency-sensitive apps, check the TTFT comparison above.