Compare/Devstral 2 vs JT-35B-Flash

Devstral 2vsJT-35B-Flash

Side-by-side comparison of pricing, 12 benchmarks, and generation speed.

Mistral

Devstral 2

Input
$0/M
Output
$0/M
Speed
37 tok/s
TTFT
1.50s
China Mobile

JT-35B-Flash

Input
Output
Speed
TTFT

Winner by Category

Cheaper
Devstral 2
Faster (tok/s)
Devstral 2
Lower Latency
Devstral 2
Benchmarks (1-1)
Tie

Pricing Comparison

MetricDevstral 2JT-35B-Flash
Input ($/M tokens)$0
Output ($/M tokens)$0
Cost for 1M input + 100K output tokens:
Devstral 2$0.00

Speed Comparison

Output Speed (tokens/s) — higher is better
Devstral 2
37 tok/s
JT-35B-Flash
Time to First Token (seconds) — lower is better
Devstral 2
1.50s
JT-35B-Flash

Editorial Analysis

Verdict. Devstral 2 and JT-35B-Flash split the benchmark comparison evenly at 1–1. The tiebreaker here is price, speed, and what you actually run them on.

Pricing. Pricing varies significantly between these models — check the table above for the exact per-token rates. Many production workloads actually surface input-token cost (retrieval-augmented prompts, code-context windows), so factor both directions.

Strengths. Devstral 2 is strongest on Coding Index (31.3), Intelligence Index (19.2). JT-35B-Flash leads on Intelligence Index (29.0).

Speed. Speed data is incomplete for this pair; benchmark and price should decide.

Provider. Mistral and China Mobile sell to overlapping but distinct developer audiences: Mistral tends to ship frontier reasoning models with premium positioning, while China Mobile often prices more aggressively. Your existing vendor relationships, billing, and SLA preferences may matter as much as the raw numbers above.

Recommendation. Both models have legitimate use cases — the right answer depends on whether you are optimizing for benchmark ceiling, latency, or unit cost. Start with the cheaper / faster model, evaluate against your specific task, and only switch if the upgrade shows a meaningful lift.

Head-to-head deltas

  • Benchmark wins tie exactly at 1–1. The tiebreaker on raw benchmark parity will be price, speed, or capability coverage.

Benchmark Comparison

Data from Artificial Analysis API — 12 benchmarks

Intelligence Index
19.229.0
Coding Index
31.3
Math Index
GPQA Diamond
MMLU-Pro
LiveCodeBench
AIME 2025
MATH-500
Humanity's Last Exam
SciCode
IFBench
TerminalBench
Devstral 21 wins
1 winsJT-35B-Flash

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is cheaper, Devstral 2 or JT-35B-Flash?

Devstral 2 is cheaper overall. Its blended price (3:1 input/output ratio) is $0.00/M tokens vs $—/M for JT-35B-Flash.

Which model performs better on benchmarks?

It's a tie — both models win 1 benchmarks each across 12 evaluated categories. See the detailed benchmark chart above for per-category results.

Which is faster for real-time applications?

Devstral 2 generates tokens faster at 37 tok/s vs — tok/s. Devstral 2 also has lower time-to-first-token (1.50s vs —s).

When should I use Devstral 2 vs JT-35B-Flash?

Choose based on your priorities: Devstral 2 for lower cost, both perform similarly on benchmarks, and Devstral 2 for faster generation. For latency-sensitive apps, check the TTFT comparison above.