Advertisement
Compare/Devstral Small 2 vs MiMo-V2.5-Pro

Devstral Small 2vsMiMo-V2.5-Pro

Side-by-side comparison of pricing, 12 benchmarks, and generation speed.

Mistral

Devstral Small 2

Input
$0/M
Output
$0/M
Speed
139 tok/s
TTFT
2.23s
Xiaomi

MiMo-V2.5-Pro

Input
$0.43/M
Output
$0.87/M
Speed
41 tok/s
TTFT
6.14s

Winner by Category

Cheaper
Devstral Small 2
Faster (tok/s)
Devstral Small 2
Lower Latency
Devstral Small 2
Benchmarks (0-2)
MiMo-V2.5-Pro

Pricing Comparison

MetricDevstral Small 2MiMo-V2.5-Pro
Input ($/M tokens)$0$0.43
Output ($/M tokens)$0$0.87
Cost for 1M input + 100K output tokens:
Devstral Small 2$0.00
MiMo-V2.5-Pro$0.52

Speed Comparison

Output Speed (tokens/s) — higher is better
Devstral Small 2
139 tok/s
MiMo-V2.5-Pro
41 tok/s
Time to First Token (seconds) — lower is better
Devstral Small 2
2.23s
MiMo-V2.5-Pro
6.14s

Editorial Analysis

Verdict. MiMo-V2.5-Pro takes the aggregate benchmark matchup 2–0 across 2 categories. Real workloads usually care about a handful of specific tasks — see the per-benchmark table above.

Pricing. Pricing varies significantly between these models — check the table above for the exact per-token rates. Many production workloads actually surface input-token cost (retrieval-augmented prompts, code-context windows), so factor both directions.

Strengths. Devstral Small 2 is strongest on Coding Index (29.3), Intelligence Index (8.4). MiMo-V2.5-Pro leads on Coding Index (60.2), Intelligence Index (26.4).

Speed. On throughput, Devstral Small 2 generates tokens at 139 tok/s versus 41 tok/s — about 71% faster. On time-to-first-token, Devstral Small 2 responds in 2230ms vs 6140ms, which matters most for chat-style UIs.

Provider. Mistral and Xiaomi sell to overlapping but distinct developer audiences: Mistral tends to ship frontier reasoning models with premium positioning, while Xiaomi often prices more aggressively. Your existing vendor relationships, billing, and SLA preferences may matter as much as the raw numbers above.

Workload cost. Workload scenarios (per million requests at 30M input + 15M output tokens): Devstral Small 2 costs $0.00 ($0/year); MiMo-V2.5-Pro costs $25.95 ($311/year). At a smaller 5M-input/2M-output scale (single-developer tool or prototype): Devstral Small 2 ≈ $0.00/run, MiMo-V2.5-Pro ≈ $3.89/run. At agent/realtime scale (200M input / 100M output per million requests): Devstral Small 2 ≈ $0/run, MiMo-V2.5-Pro ≈ $173/run. Devstral Small 2 becomes more attractive at higher volume — the absolute per-token pricing difference compounds when you ship at scale.

Recommendation. Both models have legitimate use cases — the right answer depends on whether you are optimizing for benchmark ceiling, latency, or unit cost. Start with the cheaper / faster model, evaluate against your specific task, and only switch if the upgrade shows a meaningful lift.

Head-to-head deltas

  • On throughput, Devstral Small 2 is 3.42× faster (139 tok/s vs 41 tok/s). For streaming chat or real-time agents this alone often flips the recommendation.

Benchmark Comparison

Data from Artificial Analysis API — 12 benchmarks

Intelligence Index
8.426.4
Coding Index
29.360.2
Math Index
——
GPQA Diamond
——
MMLU-Pro
——
LiveCodeBench
——
AIME 2025
——
MATH-500
——
Humanity's Last Exam
——
SciCode
——
IFBench
——
TerminalBench
——
Devstral Small 20 wins
2 winsMiMo-V2.5-Pro

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is cheaper, Devstral Small 2 or MiMo-V2.5-Pro?

Devstral Small 2 is cheaper overall. Its blended price (3:1 input/output ratio) is $0.00/M tokens vs $0.54/M for MiMo-V2.5-Pro.

Which model performs better on benchmarks?

MiMo-V2.5-Pro wins 2 out of 12 benchmarks compared to 0 for Devstral Small 2. See the detailed benchmark chart above for per-category results.

Which is faster for real-time applications?

Devstral Small 2 generates tokens faster at 139 tok/s vs 41 tok/s. Devstral Small 2 also has lower time-to-first-token (2.23s vs 6.14s).

When should I use Devstral Small 2 vs MiMo-V2.5-Pro?

Choose based on your priorities: Devstral Small 2 for lower cost, MiMo-V2.5-Pro for stronger benchmark performance, and Devstral Small 2 for faster generation. For latency-sensitive apps, check the TTFT comparison above.