Compare/ERNIE 4.5 300B A47B vs MiniMax-M2.7

ERNIE 4.5 300B A47BvsMiniMax-M2.7

Side-by-side comparison of pricing, 12 benchmarks, and generation speed.

Baidu

ERNIE 4.5 300B A47B

Input
$0.28/M
Output
$1.1/M
Speed
30 tok/s
TTFT
1.90s
MiniMax

MiniMax-M2.7

Input
$0.3/M
Output
$1.2/M
Speed
44 tok/s
TTFT
1.58s

Winner by Category

Cheaper
ERNIE 4.5 300B A47B
Faster (tok/s)
MiniMax-M2.7
Lower Latency
MiniMax-M2.7
Benchmarks (5-7)
MiniMax-M2.7

Pricing Comparison

MetricERNIE 4.5 300B A47BMiniMax-M2.7
Input ($/M tokens)$0.28$0.3
Output ($/M tokens)$1.1$1.2
Cost for 1M input + 100K output tokens:
ERNIE 4.5 300B A47B$0.39
MiniMax-M2.7$0.42

Speed Comparison

Output Speed (tokens/s) — higher is better
ERNIE 4.5 300B A47B
30 tok/s
MiniMax-M2.7
44 tok/s
Time to First Token (seconds) — lower is better
ERNIE 4.5 300B A47B
1.90s
MiniMax-M2.7
1.58s

Benchmark Comparison

Data from Artificial Analysis API — 12 benchmarks

Intelligence Index
15.049.6
Coding Index
14.541.9
Math Index
41.3
GPQA Diamond
81.1%87.4%
MMLU-Pro
77.6%
LiveCodeBench
46.7%
AIME 2025
41.3%
MATH-500
93.1%
Humanity's Last Exam
3.5%28.1%
SciCode
31.5%47.0%
IFBench
39.1%75.7%
TerminalBench
6.1%39.4%
ERNIE 4.5 300B A47B5 wins
7 winsMiniMax-M2.7

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is cheaper, ERNIE 4.5 300B A47B or MiniMax-M2.7?

ERNIE 4.5 300B A47B is cheaper overall. Its blended price (3:1 input/output ratio) is $0.48/M tokens vs $0.53/M for MiniMax-M2.7.

Which model performs better on benchmarks?

MiniMax-M2.7 wins 7 out of 12 benchmarks compared to 5 for ERNIE 4.5 300B A47B. See the detailed benchmark chart above for per-category results.

Which is faster for real-time applications?

MiniMax-M2.7 generates tokens faster at 44 tok/s vs 30 tok/s. However, MiniMax-M2.7 has lower time-to-first-token (1.58s vs 1.90s).

When should I use ERNIE 4.5 300B A47B vs MiniMax-M2.7?

Choose based on your priorities: ERNIE 4.5 300B A47B for lower cost, MiniMax-M2.7 for stronger benchmark performance, and MiniMax-M2.7 for faster generation. For latency-sensitive apps, check the TTFT comparison above.