Compare/Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite Preview (Sep '25) (Non-reasoning) vs Hermes 4 - Llama-3.1 70B (Non-reasoning)

Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite Preview (Sep '25) (Non-reasoning)vsHermes 4 - Llama-3.1 70B (Non-reasoning)

Side-by-side comparison of pricing, 12 benchmarks, and generation speed.

Google

Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite Preview (Sep '25) (Non-reasoning)

Input
$0.1/M
Output
$0.4/M
Speed
344 tok/s
TTFT
0.36s
Nous Research

Hermes 4 - Llama-3.1 70B (Non-reasoning)

Input
$0.13/M
Output
$0.4/M
Speed
81 tok/s
TTFT
0.58s

Winner by Category

Cheaper
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite Preview (Sep '25) (Non-reasoning)
Faster (tok/s)
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite Preview (Sep '25) (Non-reasoning)
Lower Latency
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite Preview (Sep '25) (Non-reasoning)
Benchmarks (11-0)
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite Preview (Sep '25) (Non-reasoning)

Pricing Comparison

MetricGemini 2.5 Flash-Lite Preview (Sep '25) (Non-reasoning)Hermes 4 - Llama-3.1 70B (Non-reasoning)
Input ($/M tokens)$0.1$0.13
Output ($/M tokens)$0.4$0.4
Cost for 1M input + 100K output tokens:
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite Preview (Sep '25) (Non-reasoning)$0.14
Hermes 4 - Llama-3.1 70B (Non-reasoning)$0.17

Speed Comparison

Output Speed (tokens/s) — higher is better
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite Preview (Sep '25) (Non-reasoning)
344 tok/s
Hermes 4 - Llama-3.1 70B (Non-reasoning)
81 tok/s
Time to First Token (seconds) — lower is better
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite Preview (Sep '25) (Non-reasoning)
0.36s
Hermes 4 - Llama-3.1 70B (Non-reasoning)
0.58s

Benchmark Comparison

Data from Artificial Analysis API — 12 benchmarks

Intelligence Index
19.412.6
Coding Index
14.59.2
Math Index
46.711.3
GPQA Diamond
65.1%49.1%
MMLU-Pro
79.6%66.4%
LiveCodeBench
64.1%26.9%
AIME 2025
46.7%11.3%
MATH-500
Humanity's Last Exam
4.6%3.6%
SciCode
28.5%27.7%
IFBench
41.8%29.0%
TerminalBench
7.6%0.0%
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite Preview (Sep '25) (Non-reasoning)11 wins
0 winsHermes 4 - Llama-3.1 70B (Non-reasoning)

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is cheaper, Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite Preview (Sep '25) (Non-reasoning) or Hermes 4 - Llama-3.1 70B (Non-reasoning)?

Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite Preview (Sep '25) (Non-reasoning) is cheaper overall. Its blended price (3:1 input/output ratio) is $0.17/M tokens vs $0.20/M for Hermes 4 - Llama-3.1 70B (Non-reasoning).

Which model performs better on benchmarks?

Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite Preview (Sep '25) (Non-reasoning) wins 11 out of 12 benchmarks compared to 0 for Hermes 4 - Llama-3.1 70B (Non-reasoning). See the detailed benchmark chart above for per-category results.

Which is faster for real-time applications?

Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite Preview (Sep '25) (Non-reasoning) generates tokens faster at 344 tok/s vs 81 tok/s. Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite Preview (Sep '25) (Non-reasoning) also has lower time-to-first-token (0.36s vs 0.58s).

When should I use Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite Preview (Sep '25) (Non-reasoning) vs Hermes 4 - Llama-3.1 70B (Non-reasoning)?

Choose based on your priorities: Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite Preview (Sep '25) (Non-reasoning) for lower cost, Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite Preview (Sep '25) (Non-reasoning) for stronger benchmark performance, and Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite Preview (Sep '25) (Non-reasoning) for faster generation. For latency-sensitive apps, check the TTFT comparison above.