Compare/Gemini 2.5 Pro vs Command A

Gemini 2.5 ProvsCommand A

Side-by-side comparison of pricing, 12 benchmarks, and generation speed.

Google

Gemini 2.5 Pro

Input
$1.25/M
Output
$10/M
Speed
131 tok/s
TTFT
23.22s
Cohere

Command A

Input
$2.5/M
Output
$10/M
Speed
47 tok/s
TTFT
0.47s

Winner by Category

Cheaper
Gemini 2.5 Pro
Faster (tok/s)
Gemini 2.5 Pro
Lower Latency
Command A
Benchmarks (12-0)
Gemini 2.5 Pro

Pricing Comparison

MetricGemini 2.5 ProCommand A
Input ($/M tokens)$1.25$2.5
Output ($/M tokens)$10$10
Cost for 1M input + 100K output tokens:
Gemini 2.5 Pro$2.25
Command A$3.50

Speed Comparison

Output Speed (tokens/s) — higher is better
Gemini 2.5 Pro
131 tok/s
Command A
47 tok/s
Time to First Token (seconds) — lower is better
Gemini 2.5 Pro
23.22s
Command A
0.47s

Benchmark Comparison

Data from Artificial Analysis API — 12 benchmarks

Intelligence Index
34.613.5
Coding Index
31.99.9
Math Index
87.713.0
GPQA Diamond
84.4%52.7%
MMLU-Pro
86.2%71.2%
LiveCodeBench
80.1%28.7%
AIME 2025
87.7%13.0%
MATH-500
96.7%81.9%
Humanity's Last Exam
21.1%4.6%
SciCode
42.8%28.1%
IFBench
48.7%36.5%
TerminalBench
26.5%0.8%
Gemini 2.5 Pro12 wins
0 winsCommand A

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is cheaper, Gemini 2.5 Pro or Command A?

Gemini 2.5 Pro is cheaper overall. Its blended price (3:1 input/output ratio) is $3.44/M tokens vs $4.38/M for Command A.

Which model performs better on benchmarks?

Gemini 2.5 Pro wins 12 out of 12 benchmarks compared to 0 for Command A. See the detailed benchmark chart above for per-category results.

Which is faster for real-time applications?

Gemini 2.5 Pro generates tokens faster at 131 tok/s vs 47 tok/s. However, Command A has lower time-to-first-token (0.47s vs 23.22s).

When should I use Gemini 2.5 Pro vs Command A?

Choose based on your priorities: Gemini 2.5 Pro for lower cost, Gemini 2.5 Pro for stronger benchmark performance, and Gemini 2.5 Pro for faster generation. For latency-sensitive apps, check the TTFT comparison above.