Compare/Gemini 3 Pro Preview (high) vs Mistral Large (Feb '24)

Gemini 3 Pro Preview (high)vsMistral Large (Feb '24)

Side-by-side comparison of pricing, 12 benchmarks, and generation speed.

Google

Gemini 3 Pro Preview (high)

Input
$2/M
Output
$12/M
Speed
TTFT
Mistral

Mistral Large (Feb '24)

Input
$4/M
Output
$12/M
Speed
TTFT

Winner by Category

Cheaper
Gemini 3 Pro Preview (high)
Faster (tok/s)
Lower Latency
Benchmarks (1-0)
Gemini 3 Pro Preview (high)

Pricing Comparison

MetricGemini 3 Pro Preview (high)Mistral Large (Feb '24)
Input ($/M tokens)$2$4
Output ($/M tokens)$12$12
Cost for 1M input + 100K output tokens:
Gemini 3 Pro Preview (high)$3.20
Mistral Large (Feb '24)$5.20

Speed Comparison

Speed data not available for these models.

Editorial Analysis

Verdict. Gemini 3 Pro Preview (high) wins the overall benchmark matchup 1–0 across 1 overlapping categories, but raw benchmark score is only one input to the decision.

Pricing. Both models sit in the mid-tier bracket for output-token pricing. At 1.0× the per-million-token cost, Mistral Large (Feb '24) is meaningfully cheaper if your traffic is output-heavy (long completions, document generation, agent loops). Mistral Large (Feb '24) makes more sense when output volume is low and absolute reasoning quality justifies the premium.

Strengths. Gemini 3 Pro Preview (high) is strongest on Intelligence Index (40.6). Mistral Large (Feb '24) leads on Intelligence Index (4.1).

Speed. Speed data is incomplete for this pair; benchmark and price should decide.

Provider. Google and Mistral sell to overlapping but distinct developer audiences: Google tends to ship frontier reasoning models with premium positioning, while Mistral often prices more aggressively. Your existing vendor relationships, billing, and SLA preferences may matter as much as the raw numbers above.

Workload cost. Workload scenarios (per million requests at 30M input + 15M output tokens): Gemini 3 Pro Preview (high) costs $240.00 ($2880/year); Mistral Large (Feb '24) costs $300.00 ($3600/year). At a smaller 5M-input/2M-output scale (single-developer tool or prototype): Gemini 3 Pro Preview (high) ≈ $34.00/run, Mistral Large (Feb '24) ≈ $44.00/run. At agent/realtime scale (200M input / 100M output per million requests): Gemini 3 Pro Preview (high) ≈ $1600/run, Mistral Large (Feb '24) ≈ $2000/run. Gemini 3 Pro Preview (high) becomes more attractive at higher volume — the absolute per-token pricing difference compounds when you ship at scale.

Recommendation. Both models have legitimate use cases — the right answer depends on whether you are optimizing for benchmark ceiling, latency, or unit cost. Start with the cheaper / faster model, evaluate against your specific task, and only switch if the upgrade shows a meaningful lift.

Benchmark Comparison

Data from Artificial Analysis API — 12 benchmarks

Intelligence Index
40.64.1
Coding Index
Math Index
GPQA Diamond
MMLU-Pro
LiveCodeBench
AIME 2025
MATH-500
Humanity's Last Exam
SciCode
IFBench
TerminalBench
Gemini 3 Pro Preview (high)1 wins
0 winsMistral Large (Feb '24)

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is cheaper, Gemini 3 Pro Preview (high) or Mistral Large (Feb '24)?

Gemini 3 Pro Preview (high) is cheaper overall. Its blended price (3:1 input/output ratio) is $4.50/M tokens vs $6.00/M for Mistral Large (Feb '24).

Which model performs better on benchmarks?

Gemini 3 Pro Preview (high) wins 1 out of 12 benchmarks compared to 0 for Mistral Large (Feb '24). See the detailed benchmark chart above for per-category results.

Which is faster for real-time applications?

Both models have comparable generation speeds.

When should I use Gemini 3 Pro Preview (high) vs Mistral Large (Feb '24)?

Choose based on your priorities: Gemini 3 Pro Preview (high) for lower cost, Gemini 3 Pro Preview (high) for stronger benchmark performance, and both have comparable speed. For latency-sensitive apps, check the TTFT comparison above.