Side-by-side comparison of pricing, 12 benchmarks, and generation speed.
| Metric | Gemma 3n E4B Instruct | Sarvam 30B (high) |
|---|---|---|
| Input ($/M tokens) | $0.02 | $0.026 |
| Output ($/M tokens) | $0.04 | $0.11 |
Data from Artificial Analysis API — 12 benchmarks
Gemma 3n E4B Instruct is cheaper overall. Its blended price (3:1 input/output ratio) is $0.03/M tokens vs $0.05/M for Sarvam 30B (high).
Gemma 3n E4B Instruct wins 7 out of 12 benchmarks compared to 4 for Sarvam 30B (high). See the detailed benchmark chart above for per-category results.
Sarvam 30B (high) generates tokens faster at 232 tok/s vs 56 tok/s. Gemma 3n E4B Instruct also has lower time-to-first-token (0.39s vs 1.16s).
Choose based on your priorities: Gemma 3n E4B Instruct for lower cost, Gemma 3n E4B Instruct for stronger benchmark performance, and Sarvam 30B (high) for faster generation. For latency-sensitive apps, check the TTFT comparison above.